MadGraph5_aMC@NLO

heft model and g g > h > mu+ mu-

Asked by Matthew Decaro

Hi all,

I'm having issues generating g g > h > mu+ mu-. I've tried using heft, heft-full, sm, and sm-full, and none of these seem to allow h > mu+ mu-. This was resolved in a previous thread (https://answers.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo/+question/238615) by sending a unique model via email. Does anyone have access to that model? Thanks!

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said : 		#1

Hi,

Since you do not seem to really want to use the heft approximation,
You can do the exact result as:
Import model sm-full
generate g g > mu+ mu- [QCD]

This is of course much slower than the heft (but obviously it is valid whatever the kinematic of the final state is).

Otherwise, you should check the model present on the FeynRules website.

Cheers,

Olivier

> On 14 Jun 2017, at 00:22, Matthew Decaro <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> New question #643769 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo/+question/643769
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having issues generating g g > h > mu+ mu-. I've tried using heft, heft-full, sm, and sm-full, and none of these seem to allow h > mu+ mu-. This was resolved in a previous thread (https://answers.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo/+question/238615) by sending a unique model via email. Does anyone have access to that model? Thanks!
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Matthew Decaro for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.