4j at NLO fails
Dear all,
I am trying to reproduce the total cross section for ee -> 4j as given in table 10 of 1405.0301, also using the parameter and run card provided at the URL given there. I have created the process by
define jbb = j b b~
generate e+ e- > jbb jbb jbb jbb [QCD]
Runnig at LO, I can reproduce the correct result. At NLO, however, the integration starts but then stops without any notification at
INFO: Idle: 86, Running: 0, Completed: 4 [ 3.8s ]
Before that, I get a message
/home/cweiss/
WARNING: program /home/cweiss/
but the program does not stop itself. Do you have an idea what I do wrong? I can provide the file `run_02_
Best,
Christian
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Answered
- Assignee:
- marco zaro Edit question
- Last query:
- Last reply:
Revision history for this message
|
#1 |
Hi Christian,
did you import the model with a massless b quark before generating the process?
you can do so by typing
import model loop_sm-no_b_mass
Also, can you copy-paste the content of the log.txt inside
/home/cweiss/
Let me know.
Best,
Marco
Revision history for this message
|
#2 |
Hi Marco,
yes, that apparently solves the problem now. The integration is running.
Thanks,
Christian
Revision history for this message
|
#3 |
I'm afraid I was a bit too hasty. The grid setup works fine giving
INFO:
Results after grid setup:
Total cross section: 1.131e-01 +- 2.3e-03 pb
However, in the actual integration which follows, I seem to get the same segfault as before:
INFO: Idle: 56, Running: 4, Completed: 0 [ current time: 22h53 ]
INFO: Idle: 55, Running: 4, Completed: 1 [ 3m 53s ]
/home/cweiss/
This is the content of the log.txt:
======
INFO: MadFKS read these parameters from FKS_params.dat
======
> IRPoleCheckThre
> PrecisionVirtua
> NHelForMCoverHels = 4
> VirtualFraction = 1.0000000000000000
> MinVirtualFraction = 5.0000000000000
======
Process in group number 0
No PDF is used, alpha_s(MZ) from param_card is used
Value of alpha_s from param_card: 0.11799999999999999
The default order of alpha_s running is fixed to 2
******
* MadGraph/MadEvent *
* -------
* http://
* http://
* http://
* -------
* *
* PARAMETER AND COUPLING VALUES *
* *
******
External Params
-----
MU_R = 91.188000000000002
aEWM1 = 132.50700000000001
mdl_Gf = 1.1663900000000
aS = 0.11799999999999999
mdl_ymt = 173.19999999999999
mdl_ymtau = 1.7769999999999999
mdl_MT = 173.19999999999999
mdl_MZ = 91.188000000000002
mdl_MH = 125.00000000000000
mdl_MTA = 1.7769999999999999
mdl_WT = 0.0000000000000000
mdl_WZ = 0.0000000000000000
mdl_WW = 0.0000000000000000
mdl_WH = 0.0000000000000000
Internal Params
-----
mdl_conjg__CKM3x3 = 1.0000000000000000
mdl_CKM22 = 1.0000000000000000
mdl_I4x33 = 0.0000000000000000
mdl_I1x33 = 0.0000000000000000
mdl_lhv = 1.0000000000000000
mdl_CKM3x3 = 1.0000000000000000
mdl_conjg__CKM22 = 1.0000000000000000
mdl_conjg__CKM33 = 1.0000000000000000
mdl_Ncol = 3.0000000000000000
mdl_CA = 3.0000000000000000
mdl_TF = 0.50000000000000000
mdl_CF = 1.3333333333333333
mdl_complexi = ( 0.0000000000000000 , 1.0000000000000000 )
mdl_MZ__exp__2 = 8315.2513440000002
mdl_MZ__exp__4 = 69143404.913893804
mdl_sqrt__2 = 1.4142135623730951
mdl_MH__exp__2 = 15625.000000000000
mdl_Ncol__exp__2 = 9.0000000000000000
mdl_MT__exp__2 = 29998.239999999994
mdl_aEW = 7.5467711139788
mdl_MW = 80.419002445756163
mdl_sqrt__aEW = 8.6872153846781
mdl_ee = 0.30795376724436879
mdl_MW__exp__2 = 6467.2159543705357
mdl_sw2 = 0.22224648578577766
mdl_cw = 0.88190334743339216
mdl_sqrt__sw2 = 0.47143025548407230
mdl_sw = 0.47143025548407230
mdl_g1 = 0.34919219678733299
mdl_gw = 0.65323293034757990
mdl_v = 246.21845810181637
mdl_v__exp__2 = 60623.529110035903
mdl_lam = 0.12886910601690263
mdl_yt = 0.99481489280438762
mdl_ytau = 1.0206617000654
mdl_muH = 88.388347648318430
mdl_AxialZUp = -0.185177018617
mdl_AxialZDown = 0.18517701861793787
mdl_VectorZUp = 7.5430507588273
mdl_VectorZDown = -0.130303763103
mdl_VectorAUp = 0.20530251149624587
mdl_VectorADown = -0.102651255748
mdl_VectorWmDxU = 0.23095271737156670
mdl_AxialWmDxU = -0.230952717371
mdl_VectorWpUxD = 0.23095271737156670
mdl_AxialWpUxD = -0.230952717371
mdl_I2x33 = ( 0.99481489280438762 , 0.0000000000000000 )
mdl_I3x33 = ( 0.99481489280438762 , 0.0000000000000000 )
mdl_Vector_tbGp = (-0.99481489280
mdl_Axial_tbGp = (-0.99481489280
mdl_Vector_tbGm = ( 0.99481489280438762 , 0.0000000000000000 )
mdl_Axial_tbGm = (-0.99481489280
mdl_gw__exp__2 = 0.42671326129048615
mdl_cw__exp__2 = 0.77775351421422245
mdl_ee__exp__2 = 9.4835522759998
mdl_sw__exp__2 = 0.22224648578577769
mdl_yt__exp__2 = 0.98965667094540521
Internal Params evaluated point by point
-----
mdl_sqrt__aS = 0.34351128074635334
mdl_G__exp__4 = 2.1987899468922913
mdl_G__exp__2 = 1.4828317324943823
mdl_R2MixedFac
mdl_G_UVg_1EPS_ = -5.164577903332
mdl_G_UVq_1EPS_ = 3.1300472141406
mdl_G_UVb_1EPS_ = 3.1300472141406
mdl_GWcft_
mdl_tWcft_UV_1EPS_ = -1.878028328484
mdl_G__exp__3 = 1.8056676068262196
mdl_MU_R__exp__2 = 8315.2513440000002
mdl_G_UVt_FIN_ = -4.015998856424
mdl_GWcft_
mdl_tWcft_UV_FIN_ = -9.443845745754
Couplings of loop_sm-no_b_mass
-----
UV_3Gt = 0.48903E-02 0.00000E+00
UV_GQQt = 0.00000E+00 -0.48903E-02
UVWfct_G_2 = 0.40160E-02 0.00000E+00
R2_DDA = 0.00000E+00 0.25704E-02
R2_UUA = -0.00000E+00 -0.51409E-02
R2_DDZ_V2 = 0.00000E+00 0.72127E-02
R2_UUZ_V2 = -0.00000E+00 -0.72127E-02
R2_UUZ_V5 = 0.00000E+00 0.68702E-03
R2_GGZup = -0.46369E-02 0.00000E+00
R2_GGZdown = 0.46369E-02 0.00000E+00
R2_GGGZvecUp = 0.00000E+00 0.28750E-03
R2_GGGZvecDown -0.00000E+00 -0.49665E-03
R2_GGGZaxialUp -0.00000E+00 -0.63522E-02
R2_GGGZaxialDow 0.00000E+00 0.63522E-02
R2_GGGAvecUp = 0.00000E+00 0.78251E-03
R2_GGGAvecDown -0.00000E+00 -0.39126E-03
GC_4 = -0.12177E+01 0.00000E+00
GC_5 = 0.00000E+00 0.12177E+01
GC_6 = 0.00000E+00 0.14828E+01
R2_3Gq = 0.76230E-02 0.00000E+00
R2_3Gg = 0.31445E-01 0.00000E+00
R2_GQQ = -0.00000E+00 -0.30492E-01
R2_GGq = 0.00000E+00 0.62601E-02
R2_GGt = -0.00000E+00 -0.11268E+04
R2_GGg_1 = 0.00000E+00 0.28170E-01
R2_GGg_2 = -0.00000E+00 -0.18780E-01
R2_QQq = 0.00000E+00 0.12520E-01
UV_3Gg_1eps = 0.62890E-01 0.00000E+00
UV_3Gb_1eps = -0.38115E-02 0.00000E+00
UV_GQQg_1eps = 0.00000E+00 -0.62890E-01
UV_GQQq_1eps = 0.00000E+00 0.38115E-02
UVWfct_G_2_1eps -0.31300E-02 0.00000E+00
GC_1 = -0.00000E+00 -0.10265E+00
GC_2 = 0.00000E+00 0.20530E+00
GC_21 = -0.00000E+00 -0.28804E+00
GC_22 = 0.00000E+00 0.28804E+00
GC_23 = -0.00000E+00 -0.27437E-01
GC_24 = 0.00000E+00 0.82310E-01
GC_1003 = -0.00000E+00 -0.30795E+00
Collider parameters:
------
Running at e e machine @ 1000.0000000000000 GeV
PDF set = none
alpha_s(Mz)= 0.1180 running at 2 loops.
alpha_s(Mz)= 0.1180 running at 2 loops.
Renormalization scale set on event-by-event basis
Factorization scale set on event-by-event basis
Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 1
Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 2
Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 3
Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 4
Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 5
Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 6
getting user params
Number of phase-space points per iteration: 175542
Maximum number of iterations is: 7
Desired accuracy is: 5.3061136774599
Using adaptive grids: 2
Using Multi-channel integration
Do MC over helicities for the virtuals
Running Configuration Number: 4
Splitting channel: 0
doing the all of this channel
Normal integration (Sfunction != 1)
RESTART: Use old grids, but refil plots
Not subdividing B.W.
about to integrate 11 175542 7 4
Update iterations and points to 7 175542
imode is -1
#------
# FastJet release 3.1.3 [fjcore]
# M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez
# A software package for jet finding and analysis at colliders
# http://
#
# Please cite EPJC72(2012)1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] if you use this package
# for scientific work and optionally PLB641(2006)57 [hep-ph/0512210].
#
# FastJet is provided without warranty under the terms of the GNU GPLv2.
# It uses T. Chan's closest pair algorithm, S. Fortune's Voronoi code
# and 3rd party plugin jet algorithms. See COPYING file for details.
#------
+----
| |
| Ninja - version 1.1.0 |
| |
| Author: Tiziano Peraro |
| |
| Based on: |
| |
| P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella and T. Peraro, |
| "Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes |
| through Laurent series expansion," |
| JHEP 1206 (2012) 095 [arXiv:1203.0291 [hep-ph]]. |
| |
| T. Peraro, |
| "Ninja: Automated Integrand Reduction via Laurent |
| Expansion for One-Loop Amplitudes," |
| Comput.Phys.Commun. 185 (2014) [arXiv:1403.1229 [hep-ph]] |
| |
+----
------- iteration 1
Update # PS points (even): 175542 --> 174080
Using random seed offsets: 4 , 1 , 0
with seed 35
Ranmar initialization seeds 14390 9410
Total number of FKS directories is 6
For the Born we use nFKSprocesses # 0 3
nFKSprocess: 1. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 1. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 2. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 2. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 3. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 3. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 4. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 4. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 5. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 5. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 6. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
nFKSprocess: 6. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
bpower is 2.0000000000000000
Scale values (may change event by event):
muR, muR_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
muF1, muF1_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
muF2, muF2_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
QES, QES_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
muR_reference [functional form]:
H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
muF1_reference [functional form]:
H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
muF2_reference [functional form]:
H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
QES_reference [functional form]:
H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
alpha_s= 9.4588782287462
alpha_s value used for the virtuals is (for the first PS point): 0.10561757838397419
=====
{ }
{ [32m [0m }
{ [32m ,, [0m }
{ [32m`7MMM. ,MMF' `7MM `7MMF' [0m }
{ [32m MMMb dPMM MM MM [0m }
{ [32m M YM ,M MM ,6"Yb. ,M""bMM MM ,pW"Wq. ,pW"Wq.`7MMpdMAo. [0m }
{ [32m M Mb M' MM 8) MM ,AP MM MM 6W' `Wb 6W' `Wb MM `Wb [0m }
{ [32m M YM.P' MM ,pm9MM 8MI MM MM , 8M M8 8M M8 MM M8 [0m }
{ [32m M `YM' MM 8M MM `Mb MM MM ,M YA. ,A9 YA. ,A9 MM ,AP [0m }
{ [32m.JML. `' .JMML.`
{ [32m MM [0m }
{ [32m .JMML. [0m }
{ [32m[0mv2.5.2 (2016-12-10), Ref: arXiv:1103.0621v2, arXiv:1405.
{ [32m [0m }
{ }
=====
======
INFO: MadLoop read these parameters from ../MadLoop5_
======
> MLReductionLib = 6|7|1
> CTModeRun = -1
> MLStabThres = 1.0000000000000
> NRotations_DP = 0
> NRotations_QP = 0
> CTStabThres = 1.0000000000000
> CTLoopLibrary = 2
> CTModeInit = 1
> CheckCycle = 3
> MaxAttempts = 10
> UseLoopFilter = F
> HelicityFilterLevel = 2
> ImprovePSPoint = 2
> DoubleCheckHeli
> LoopInitStartOver = F
> HelInitStartOver = F
> ZeroThres = 1.0000000000000
> OSThres = 1.0000000000000
> WriteOutFilters = T
> UseQPIntegrandF
> UseQPIntegrandF
> IREGIMODE = 2
> IREGIRECY = T
> COLLIERMode = 1
> COLLIERRequired
> COLLIERCanOutput = F
> COLLIERComputeU
> COLLIERComputeI
> COLLIERGlobalCache = -1
> COLLIERUseCache
> COLLIERUseInter
======
-------
| You are using CutTools - Version 1.9.3 |
| Authors: G. Ossola, C. Papadopoulos, R. Pittau |
| Published in JHEP 0803:042,2008 |
| http://
| |
| Compiler with 34 significant digits detetected |
------
#######
# #
# You are using OneLOop-3.6 #
# #
# for the evaluation of 1-loop scalar 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-point functions #
# #
# author: Andreas van Hameren <email address hidden> #
# date: 18-02-2015 #
# #
# Please cite #
# A. van Hameren, #
# Comput.Phys.Commun. 182 (2011) 2427-2438, arXiv:1007.4716 #
# A. van Hameren, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, #
# JHEP 0909:106,2009, arXiv:0903.4665 #
# in publications with results obtained with the help of this program. #
# #
#######
#######
# #
# You are using OneLOop-3.6 #
# #
# for the evaluation of 1-loop scalar 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-point functions #
# #
# author: Andreas van Hameren <email address hidden> #
# date: 18-02-2015 #
# #
# Please cite #
# A. van Hameren, #
# Comput.Phys.Commun. 182 (2011) 2427-2438, arXiv:1007.4716 #
# A. van Hameren, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, #
# JHEP 0909:106,2009, arXiv:0903.4665 #
# in publications with results obtained with the help of this program. #
# #
#######
---- POLES CANCELLED ----
ABS integral = 0.1690E-01 +/- 0.2688E-03 ( 1.590 %)
Integral = 0.7682E-02 +/- 0.2712E-03 ( 3.531 %)
Virtual = -.6913E-04 +/- 0.1072E-03 ( 155.011 %)
Virtual ratio = 0.1108E+02 +/- 0.1857E+00 ( 1.676 %)
ABS virtual = 0.1801E-02 +/- 0.1071E-03 ( 5.946 %)
Born*ao2pi = 0.1089E-03 +/- 0.3131E-05 ( 2.875 %)
Chi^2 per d.o.f. 0.0000E+00
accumulated results ABS integral = 0.1690E-01 +/- 0.2688E-03 ( 1.590 %)
accumulated results Integral = 0.7682E-02 +/- 0.2712E-03 ( 3.531 %)
accumulated results Virtual = -.6913E-04 +/- 0.1072E-03 ( 155.011 %)
accumulated results Virtual ratio = 0.1108E+02 +/- 0.1857E+00 ( 1.676 %)
accumulated results ABS virtual = 0.1801E-02 +/- 0.1071E-03 ( 5.946 %)
accumulated results Born*ao2pi = 0.1089E-03 +/- 0.3131E-05 ( 2.875 %)
accumulated result Chi^2 per DoF = 0.0000E+00
update virtual fraction to: 0.070 -5.627
1: 0 1 2 3 45 6
------- iteration 2
Update # PS points (even): 175542 --> 174080
ABS integral = 0.1668E-01 +/- 0.2370E-03 ( 1.421 %)
Integral = 0.7622E-02 +/- 0.2397E-03 ( 3.144 %)
Virtual = 0.1370E-04 +/- 0.9630E-04 ( 702.801 %)
Virtual ratio = 0.1134E+02 +/- 0.2008E+00 ( 1.770 %)
ABS virtual = 0.1679E-02 +/- 0.9621E-04 ( 5.730 %)
Born*ao2pi = 0.1062E-03 +/- 0.3639E-05 ( 3.427 %)
Chi^2= 0.2022E+00
accumulated results ABS integral = 0.1678E-01 +/- 0.1778E-03 ( 1.059 %)
accumulated results Integral = 0.7650E-02 +/- 0.1796E-03 ( 2.348 %)
accumulated results Virtual = -.2550E-04 +/- 0.7162E-04 ( 280.851 %)
accumulated results Virtual ratio = 0.1121E+02 +/- 0.1363E+00 ( 1.216 %)
accumulated results ABS virtual = 0.1737E-02 +/- 0.7156E-04 ( 4.121 %)
accumulated results Born*ao2pi = 0.1076E-03 +/- 0.2373E-05 ( 2.205 %)
accumulated result Chi^2 per DoF = 0.2022E+00
update virtual fraction to: 0.056 -5.927
1: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
------- iteration 3
Update # PS points (even): 175542 --> 174080
* C O L L I E R *
* *
* Complex One-Loop Library *
* In Extended Regularizations *
* *
* by A.Denner, S.Dittmaier, L.Hofer *
* *
* version 1.1 *
* *
ABS integral = 0.2739E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 99.993 %)
Integral = -.2738E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 100.003 %)
Virtual = -.2739E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 100.000 %)
Virtual ratio = -.1458E+07 +/- 0.1457E+07 ( 99.991 %)
ABS virtual = 0.2739E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 99.999 %)
Born*ao2pi = 0.1088E-03 +/- 0.3770E-05 ( 3.464 %)
Chi^2= 0.1000E+01
accumulated results ABS integral = 0.1696E-01 +/- 0.1778E-03 ( 1.048 %)
accumulated results Integral = 0.7470E-02 +/- 0.1796E-03 ( 2.404 %)
accumulated results Virtual = -.9713E-04 +/- 0.7162E-04 ( 73.743 %)
accumulated results Virtual ratio = 0.1107E+02 +/- 0.1363E+00 ( 1.231 %)
accumulated results ABS virtual = 0.1808E-02 +/- 0.7156E-04 ( 3.958 %)
accumulated results Born*ao2pi = 0.1081E-03 +/- 0.2008E-05 ( 1.858 %)
accumulated result Chi^2 per DoF = 0.6011E+00
update virtual fraction to: 0.113 *******
1: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Revision history for this message
|
#4 |
Hi Christian,
can you try to disable collier?
to do so open
Cards/MadLoopPa
#MLReductionLib
!6|7|1
to
#MLReductionLib
6|1
(remove also the exclamation mark at the beginning of the line…
Let me know if this helps
Cheers,
Marco
On 02 Mar 2017, at 18:22, Christian Weiss <email address hidden> wrote:
> Question #503117 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Status: Solved => Open
>
> Christian Weiss is still having a problem:
> I'm afraid I was a bit too hasty. The grid setup works fine giving
>
> INFO:
> Results after grid setup:
> Total cross section: 1.131e-01 +- 2.3e-03 pb
>
> However, in the actual integration which follows, I seem to get the same
> segfault as before:
>
> INFO: Idle: 56, Running: 4, Completed: 0 [ current time: 22h53 ]
> INFO: Idle: 55, Running: 4, Completed: 1 [ 3m 53s ]
> /home/cweiss/
>
> This is the content of the log.txt:
>
> =======
> INFO: MadFKS read these parameters from FKS_params.dat
> =======
>> IRPoleCheckThre
>> PrecisionVirtua
>> NHelForMCoverHels = 4
>> VirtualFraction = 1.0000000000000000
>> MinVirtualFraction = 5.0000000000000
> =======
> Process in group number 0
> No PDF is used, alpha_s(MZ) from param_card is used
> Value of alpha_s from param_card: 0.11799999999999999
> The default order of alpha_s running is fixed to 2
> *******
> * MadGraph/MadEvent *
> * -------
> * http://
> * http://
> * http://
> * -------
> * *
> * PARAMETER AND COUPLING VALUES *
> * *
> *******
>
> External Params
> -------
>
> MU_R = 91.188000000000002
> aEWM1 = 132.50700000000001
> mdl_Gf = 1.1663900000000
> aS = 0.11799999999999999
> mdl_ymt = 173.19999999999999
> mdl_ymtau = 1.7769999999999999
> mdl_MT = 173.19999999999999
> mdl_MZ = 91.188000000000002
> mdl_MH = 125.00000000000000
> mdl_MTA = 1.7769999999999999
> mdl_WT = 0.0000000000000000
> mdl_WZ = 0.0000000000000000
> mdl_WW = 0.0000000000000000
> mdl_WH = 0.0000000000000000
> Internal Params
> -------
>
> mdl_conjg__CKM3x3 = 1.0000000000000000
> mdl_CKM22 = 1.0000000000000000
> mdl_I4x33 = 0.0000000000000000
> mdl_I1x33 = 0.0000000000000000
> mdl_lhv = 1.0000000000000000
> mdl_CKM3x3 = 1.0000000000000000
> mdl_conjg__CKM22 = 1.0000000000000000
> mdl_conjg__CKM33 = 1.0000000000000000
> mdl_Ncol = 3.0000000000000000
> mdl_CA = 3.0000000000000000
> mdl_TF = 0.50000000000000000
> mdl_CF = 1.3333333333333333
> mdl_complexi = ( 0.0000000000000000 , 1.0000000000000000 )
> mdl_MZ__exp__2 = 8315.2513440000002
> mdl_MZ__exp__4 = 69143404.913893804
> mdl_sqrt__2 = 1.4142135623730951
> mdl_MH__exp__2 = 15625.000000000000
> mdl_Ncol__exp__2 = 9.0000000000000000
> mdl_MT__exp__2 = 29998.239999999994
> mdl_aEW = 7.5467711139788
> mdl_MW = 80.419002445756163
> mdl_sqrt__aEW = 8.6872153846781
> mdl_ee = 0.30795376724436879
> mdl_MW__exp__2 = 6467.2159543705357
> mdl_sw2 = 0.22224648578577766
> mdl_cw = 0.88190334743339216
> mdl_sqrt__sw2 = 0.47143025548407230
> mdl_sw = 0.47143025548407230
> mdl_g1 = 0.34919219678733299
> mdl_gw = 0.65323293034757990
> mdl_v = 246.21845810181637
> mdl_v__exp__2 = 60623.529110035903
> mdl_lam = 0.12886910601690263
> mdl_yt = 0.99481489280438762
> mdl_ytau = 1.0206617000654
> mdl_muH = 88.388347648318430
> mdl_AxialZUp = -0.185177018617
> mdl_AxialZDown = 0.18517701861793787
> mdl_VectorZUp = 7.5430507588273
> mdl_VectorZDown = -0.130303763103
> mdl_VectorAUp = 0.20530251149624587
> mdl_VectorADown = -0.102651255748
> mdl_VectorWmDxU = 0.23095271737156670
> mdl_AxialWmDxU = -0.230952717371
> mdl_VectorWpUxD = 0.23095271737156670
> mdl_AxialWpUxD = -0.230952717371
> mdl_I2x33 = ( 0.99481489280438762 , 0.0000000000000000 )
> mdl_I3x33 = ( 0.99481489280438762 , 0.0000000000000000 )
> mdl_Vector_tbGp = (-0.99481489280
> mdl_Axial_tbGp = (-0.99481489280
> mdl_Vector_tbGm = ( 0.99481489280438762 , 0.0000000000000000 )
> mdl_Axial_tbGm = (-0.99481489280
> mdl_gw__exp__2 = 0.42671326129048615
> mdl_cw__exp__2 = 0.77775351421422245
> mdl_ee__exp__2 = 9.4835522759998
> mdl_sw__exp__2 = 0.22224648578577769
> mdl_yt__exp__2 = 0.98965667094540521
> Internal Params evaluated point by point
> -------
>
> mdl_sqrt__aS = 0.34351128074635334
> mdl_G__exp__4 = 2.1987899468922913
> mdl_G__exp__2 = 1.4828317324943823
> mdl_R2MixedFact
> mdl_G_UVg_1EPS_ = -5.164577903332
> mdl_G_UVq_1EPS_ = 3.1300472141406
> mdl_G_UVb_1EPS_ = 3.1300472141406
> mdl_GWcft_
> mdl_tWcft_UV_1EPS_ = -1.878028328484
> mdl_G__exp__3 = 1.8056676068262196
> mdl_MU_R__exp__2 = 8315.2513440000002
> mdl_G_UVt_FIN_ = -4.015998856424
> mdl_GWcft_UV_t_FIN_ = 4.0159988564249
> mdl_tWcft_UV_FIN_ = -9.443845745754
> Couplings of loop_sm-no_b_mass
> -------
>
> UV_3Gt = 0.48903E-02 0.00000E+00
> UV_GQQt = 0.00000E+00 -0.48903E-02
> UVWfct_G_2 = 0.40160E-02 0.00000E+00
> R2_DDA = 0.00000E+00 0.25704E-02
> R2_UUA = -0.00000E+00 -0.51409E-02
> R2_DDZ_V2 = 0.00000E+00 0.72127E-02
> R2_UUZ_V2 = -0.00000E+00 -0.72127E-02
> R2_UUZ_V5 = 0.00000E+00 0.68702E-03
> R2_GGZup = -0.46369E-02 0.00000E+00
> R2_GGZdown = 0.46369E-02 0.00000E+00
> R2_GGGZvecUp = 0.00000E+00 0.28750E-03
> R2_GGGZvecDown -0.00000E+00 -0.49665E-03
> R2_GGGZaxialUp -0.00000E+00 -0.63522E-02
> R2_GGGZaxialDow 0.00000E+00 0.63522E-02
> R2_GGGAvecUp = 0.00000E+00 0.78251E-03
> R2_GGGAvecDown -0.00000E+00 -0.39126E-03
> GC_4 = -0.12177E+01 0.00000E+00
> GC_5 = 0.00000E+00 0.12177E+01
> GC_6 = 0.00000E+00 0.14828E+01
> R2_3Gq = 0.76230E-02 0.00000E+00
> R2_3Gg = 0.31445E-01 0.00000E+00
> R2_GQQ = -0.00000E+00 -0.30492E-01
> R2_GGq = 0.00000E+00 0.62601E-02
> R2_GGt = -0.00000E+00 -0.11268E+04
> R2_GGg_1 = 0.00000E+00 0.28170E-01
> R2_GGg_2 = -0.00000E+00 -0.18780E-01
> R2_QQq = 0.00000E+00 0.12520E-01
> UV_3Gg_1eps = 0.62890E-01 0.00000E+00
> UV_3Gb_1eps = -0.38115E-02 0.00000E+00
> UV_GQQg_1eps = 0.00000E+00 -0.62890E-01
> UV_GQQq_1eps = 0.00000E+00 0.38115E-02
> UVWfct_G_2_1eps -0.31300E-02 0.00000E+00
> GC_1 = -0.00000E+00 -0.10265E+00
> GC_2 = 0.00000E+00 0.20530E+00
> GC_21 = -0.00000E+00 -0.28804E+00
> GC_22 = 0.00000E+00 0.28804E+00
> GC_23 = -0.00000E+00 -0.27437E-01
> GC_24 = 0.00000E+00 0.82310E-01
> GC_1003 = -0.00000E+00 -0.30795E+00
>
> Collider parameters:
> -------
>
> Running at e e machine @ 1000.0000000000000 GeV
> PDF set = none
> alpha_s(Mz)= 0.1180 running at 2 loops.
> alpha_s(Mz)= 0.1180 running at 2 loops.
> Renormalization scale set on event-by-event basis
> Factorization scale set on event-by-event basis
>
>
> Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 1
> Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 2
> Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 3
> Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 4
> Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 5
> Diagram information for clustering has been set-up for nFKSprocess 6
> getting user params
> Number of phase-space points per iteration: 175542
> Maximum number of iterations is: 7
> Desired accuracy is: 5.3061136774599
> Using adaptive grids: 2
> Using Multi-channel integration
> Do MC over helicities for the virtuals
> Running Configuration Number: 4
> Splitting channel: 0
> doing the all of this channel
> Normal integration (Sfunction != 1)
> RESTART: Use old grids, but refil plots
> Not subdividing B.W.
> about to integrate 11 175542 7 4
> Update iterations and points to 7 175542
> imode is -1
> #------
> # FastJet release 3.1.3 [fjcore]
> # M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez
> # A software package for jet finding and analysis at colliders
> # http://
> #
> # Please cite EPJC72(2012)1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] if you use this package
> # for scientific work and optionally PLB641(2006)57 [hep-ph/0512210].
> #
> # FastJet is provided without warranty under the terms of the GNU GPLv2.
> # It uses T. Chan's closest pair algorithm, S. Fortune's Voronoi code
> # and 3rd party plugin jet algorithms. See COPYING file for details.
> #------
>
> +------
> | |
> | Ninja - version 1.1.0 |
> | |
> | Author: Tiziano Peraro |
> | |
> | Based on: |
> | |
> | P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella and T. Peraro, |
> | "Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes |
> | through Laurent series expansion," |
> | JHEP 1206 (2012) 095 [arXiv:1203.0291 [hep-ph]]. |
> | |
> | T. Peraro, |
> | "Ninja: Automated Integrand Reduction via Laurent |
> | Expansion for One-Loop Amplitudes," |
> | Comput.Phys.Commun. 185 (2014) [arXiv:1403.1229 [hep-ph]] |
> | |
> +------
>
>
> ------- iteration 1
> Update # PS points (even): 175542 --> 174080
> Using random seed offsets: 4 , 1 , 0
> with seed 35
> Ranmar initialization seeds 14390 9410
> Total number of FKS directories is 6
> For the Born we use nFKSprocesses # 0 3
> nFKSprocess: 1. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 1. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 2. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 2. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 3. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 3. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 4. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 4. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 5. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 5. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 6. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> nFKSprocess: 6. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.14400E-01 0.12000E+03 0.10000E+04
> bpower is 2.0000000000000000
> Scale values (may change event by event):
> muR, muR_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
> muF1, muF1_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
> muF2, muF2_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
> QES, QES_reference: 0.474445D+03 0.474445D+03 1.00
>
> muR_reference [functional form]:
> H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
> muF1_reference [functional form]:
> H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
> muF2_reference [functional form]:
> H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
> QES_reference [functional form]:
> H_T/2 := sum_i mT(i)/2, i=final state
>
> alpha_s= 9.4588782287462
> alpha_s value used for the virtuals is (for the first PS point): 0.10561757838397419
> =======
> { }
> { [32m [0m }
> { [32m ,, [0m }
> { [32m`7MMM. ,MMF' `7MM `7MMF' [0m }
> { [32m MMMb dPMM MM MM [0m }
> { [32m M YM ,M MM ,6"Yb. ,M""bMM MM ,pW"Wq. ,pW"Wq.`7MMpdMAo. [0m }
> { [32m M Mb M' MM 8) MM ,AP MM MM 6W' `Wb 6W' `Wb MM `Wb [0m }
> { [32m M YM.P' MM ,pm9MM 8MI MM MM , 8M M8 8M M8 MM M8 [0m }
> { [32m M `YM' MM 8M MM `Mb MM MM ,M YA. ,A9 YA. ,A9 MM ,AP [0m }
> { [32m.JML. `' .JMML.`
> { [32m MM [0m }
> { [32m .JMML. [0m }
> { [32m[0mv2.5.2 (2016-12-10), Ref: arXiv:1103.0621v2, arXiv:1405.
> { [32m [0m }
> { }
> =======
> =======
> INFO: MadLoop read these parameters from ../MadLoop5_
> =======
>> MLReductionLib = 6|7|1
>> CTModeRun = -1
>> MLStabThres = 1.0000000000000
>> NRotations_DP = 0
>> NRotations_QP = 0
>> CTStabThres = 1.0000000000000
>> CTLoopLibrary = 2
>> CTModeInit = 1
>> CheckCycle = 3
>> MaxAttempts = 10
>> UseLoopFilter = F
>> HelicityFilterLevel = 2
>> ImprovePSPoint = 2
>> DoubleCheckHeli
>> LoopInitStartOver = F
>> HelInitStartOver = F
>> ZeroThres = 1.0000000000000
>> OSThres = 1.0000000000000
>> WriteOutFilters = T
>> UseQPIntegrandF
>> UseQPIntegrandF
>> IREGIMODE = 2
>> IREGIRECY = T
>> COLLIERMode = 1
>> COLLIERRequired
>> COLLIERCanOutput = F
>> COLLIERComputeU
>> COLLIERComputeI
>> COLLIERGlobalCache = -1
>> COLLIERUseCache
>> COLLIERUseInter
> =======
>
> -------
> | You are using CutTools - Version 1.9.3 |
> | Authors: G. Ossola, C. Papadopoulos, R. Pittau |
> | Published in JHEP 0803:042,2008 |
> | http://
> | |
> | Compiler with 34 significant digits detetected |
> -------
>
> #######
> # #
> # You are using OneLOop-3.6 #
> # #
> # for the evaluation of 1-loop scalar 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-point functions #
> # #
> # author: Andreas van Hameren <email address hidden> #
> # date: 18-02-2015 #
> # #
> # Please cite #
> # A. van Hameren, #
> # Comput.Phys.Commun. 182 (2011) 2427-2438, arXiv:1007.4716 #
> # A. van Hameren, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, #
> # JHEP 0909:106,2009, arXiv:0903.4665 #
> # in publications with results obtained with the help of this program. #
> # #
> #######
> #######
> # #
> # You are using OneLOop-3.6 #
> # #
> # for the evaluation of 1-loop scalar 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-point functions #
> # #
> # author: Andreas van Hameren <email address hidden> #
> # date: 18-02-2015 #
> # #
> # Please cite #
> # A. van Hameren, #
> # Comput.Phys.Commun. 182 (2011) 2427-2438, arXiv:1007.4716 #
> # A. van Hameren, C.G. Papadopoulos and R. Pittau, #
> # JHEP 0909:106,2009, arXiv:0903.4665 #
> # in publications with results obtained with the help of this program. #
> # #
> #######
> ---- POLES CANCELLED ----
> ABS integral = 0.1690E-01 +/- 0.2688E-03 ( 1.590 %)
> Integral = 0.7682E-02 +/- 0.2712E-03 ( 3.531 %)
> Virtual = -.6913E-04 +/- 0.1072E-03 ( 155.011 %)
> Virtual ratio = 0.1108E+02 +/- 0.1857E+00 ( 1.676 %)
> ABS virtual = 0.1801E-02 +/- 0.1071E-03 ( 5.946 %)
> Born*ao2pi = 0.1089E-03 +/- 0.3131E-05 ( 2.875 %)
> Chi^2 per d.o.f. 0.0000E+00
> accumulated results ABS integral = 0.1690E-01 +/- 0.2688E-03 ( 1.590 %)
> accumulated results Integral = 0.7682E-02 +/- 0.2712E-03 ( 3.531 %)
> accumulated results Virtual = -.6913E-04 +/- 0.1072E-03 ( 155.011 %)
> accumulated results Virtual ratio = 0.1108E+02 +/- 0.1857E+00 ( 1.676 %)
> accumulated results ABS virtual = 0.1801E-02 +/- 0.1071E-03 ( 5.946 %)
> accumulated results Born*ao2pi = 0.1089E-03 +/- 0.3131E-05 ( 2.875 %)
> accumulated result Chi^2 per DoF = 0.0000E+00
> update virtual fraction to: 0.070 -5.627
> 1: 0 1 2 3 45 6
> ------- iteration 2
> Update # PS points (even): 175542 --> 174080
> ABS integral = 0.1668E-01 +/- 0.2370E-03 ( 1.421 %)
> Integral = 0.7622E-02 +/- 0.2397E-03 ( 3.144 %)
> Virtual = 0.1370E-04 +/- 0.9630E-04 ( 702.801 %)
> Virtual ratio = 0.1134E+02 +/- 0.2008E+00 ( 1.770 %)
> ABS virtual = 0.1679E-02 +/- 0.9621E-04 ( 5.730 %)
> Born*ao2pi = 0.1062E-03 +/- 0.3639E-05 ( 3.427 %)
> Chi^2= 0.2022E+00
> accumulated results ABS integral = 0.1678E-01 +/- 0.1778E-03 ( 1.059 %)
> accumulated results Integral = 0.7650E-02 +/- 0.1796E-03 ( 2.348 %)
> accumulated results Virtual = -.2550E-04 +/- 0.7162E-04 ( 280.851 %)
> accumulated results Virtual ratio = 0.1121E+02 +/- 0.1363E+00 ( 1.216 %)
> accumulated results ABS virtual = 0.1737E-02 +/- 0.7156E-04 ( 4.121 %)
> accumulated results Born*ao2pi = 0.1076E-03 +/- 0.2373E-05 ( 2.205 %)
> accumulated result Chi^2 per DoF = 0.2022E+00
> update virtual fraction to: 0.056 -5.927
> 1: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
> ------- iteration 3
> Update # PS points (even): 175542 --> 174080
>
> *******
> * C O L L I E R *
> * *
> * Complex One-Loop Library *
> * In Extended Regularizations *
> * *
> * by A.Denner, S.Dittmaier, L.Hofer *
> * *
> * version 1.1 *
> * *
> *******
>
> ABS integral = 0.2739E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 99.993 %)
> Integral = -.2738E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 100.003 %)
> Virtual = -.2739E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 100.000 %)
> Virtual ratio = -.1458E+07 +/- 0.1457E+07 ( 99.991 %)
> ABS virtual = 0.2739E+03 +/- 0.2739E+03 ( 99.999 %)
> Born*ao2pi = 0.1088E-03 +/- 0.3770E-05 ( 3.464 %)
> Chi^2= 0.1000E+01
> accumulated results ABS integral = 0.1696E-01 +/- 0.1778E-03 ( 1.048 %)
> accumulated results Integral = 0.7470E-02 +/- 0.1796E-03 ( 2.404 %)
> accumulated results Virtual = -.9713E-04 +/- 0.7162E-04 ( 73.743 %)
> accumulated results Virtual ratio = 0.1107E+02 +/- 0.1363E+00 ( 1.231 %)
> accumulated results ABS virtual = 0.1808E-02 +/- 0.7156E-04 ( 3.958 %)
> accumulated results Born*ao2pi = 0.1081E-03 +/- 0.2008E-05 ( 1.858 %)
> accumulated result Chi^2 per DoF = 0.6011E+00
> update virtual fraction to: 0.113 *******
> 1: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are subscribed to
> the question.
Can you help with this problem?
Provide an answer of your own, or ask Christian Weiss for more information if necessary.