In type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is with three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by madanalysis plot card because its defined for only SM neutrinos. How do I define missing transverse energ in this model?
I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that there are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos. How do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum for neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Answered
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Last query:
- Last reply:
|
Revision history for this message
|
#1 |
Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
> https:/
>
> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that there are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos. How do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum for neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#2 |
Hi,
yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in plot
card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as missing
energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM neutrinos, it
is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new neutrinos.
Thanks and regards,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Status: Open => Answered
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>> https:/
>>
>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that there
>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by
>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos. How
>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum for
>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#3 |
Hi,
mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the mET class is special. That’s the meaning of that of the comment.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in plot
> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as missing
> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM neutrinos, it
> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>
> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
> neutrinos.
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Deepanjali
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Status: Open => Answered
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that there
>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by
>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos. How
>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum for
>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#4 |
Hi,
I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
did not me any plot.
I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not have idea.
And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you plz
suggest me.
Thanking you.
Regards,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
> reserved
>
> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the mET
> class is special. Thatâs the meaning of that of the comment.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in plot
>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>> missing
>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM neutrinos, it
>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>
>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>> neutrinos.
>>
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>> there
>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by
>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos.
>>>> How
>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum for
>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#5 |
Hi,
> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
> did not me any plot.
Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
This should be the only place where to do it.
(and it works for me)
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
> did not me any plot.
> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not have idea.
>
> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you plz
> suggest me.
>
> Thanking you.
> Regards,
> Deepanjali
>
>
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>> reserved
>>
>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the mET
>> class is special. Thatâs the meaning of that of the comment.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in plot
>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>> missing
>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM neutrinos, it
>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>
>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>> neutrinos.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>>> there
>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by
>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos.
>>>>> How
>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum for
>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#6 |
Hi,
I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
Where I defined the mET.
Please find the attachment.
Thanking You.
Regards,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
>> did not give any plot.
>
> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
> This should be the only place where to do it.
> (and it works for me)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
>> did not me any plot.
>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not have
>> idea.
>>
>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you
>> plz
>> suggest me.
>>
>> Thanking you.
>> Regards,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>> reserved
>>>
>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the mET
>>> class is special. ThatâÂÂs the meaning of that of the comment.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in
>>>> plot
>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>> missing
>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM neutrinos,
>>>> it
>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>
>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by
>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos.
>>>>>> How
>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#7 |
Hi,
They are no attachment.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
> Where I defined the mET.
>
> Please find the attachment.
>
> Thanking You.
> Regards,
> Deepanjali
>
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
>>> did not give any plot.
>>
>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>> (and it works for me)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but it
>>> did not me any plot.
>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not have
>>> idea.
>>>
>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you
>>> plz
>>> suggest me.
>>>
>>> Thanking you.
>>> Regards,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>> reserved
>>>>
>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the mET
>>>> class is special. ThatâÂÂs the meaning of that of the comment.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in
>>>>> plot
>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>>> missing
>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM neutrinos,
>>>>> it
>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected by
>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM neutrinos.
>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>>> us
>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#8 |
Hi,
I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
Please find it now.
Cheers,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
> They are no attachment.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>> Where I defined the mET.
>>
>> Please find the attachment.
>>
>> Thanking You.
>> Regards,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but
>>>> it
>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>
>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>> (and it works for me)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but
>>>> it
>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not
>>>> have
>>>> idea.
>>>>
>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you
>>>> plz
>>>> suggest me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanking you.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>> reserved
>>>>>
>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the
>>>>> mET
>>>>> class is special. ThatâÃÂÃÂs the meaning of that of the
>>>>> comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in
>>>>>> plot
>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>>>> missing
>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected
>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#9 |
Hi,
If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
# Put here your list of classes
#******
# Do NOT put spaces before class names!
# Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
l 11 # Class number 2
mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
# End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
Kindly see my problem.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>
> Please find it now.
>
> Cheers,
> Deepanjali
>
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> They are no attachment.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>
>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>
>>> Thanking You.
>>> Regards,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but
>>>>> it
>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>
>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but
>>>>> it
>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not
>>>>> have
>>>>> idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you
>>>>> plz
>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the
>>>>>> mET
>>>>>> class is special. ThatÃÂ
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in
>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>> let
>>>>>> us
>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#10 |
That’s the correct syntax.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>
> Hi,
> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>
> # Put here your list of classes
> #******
> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
> l 11 # Class number 2
> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>
>
> Kindly see my problem.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Regards,
> Deepanjali
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>
>> Please find it now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> They are no attachment.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>
>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>
>>>> Thanking You.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET, but
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can you
>>>>>> plz
>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the
>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>> class is special. ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG in
>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is that
>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be detected
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse momentum
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#11 |
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
What may be the reason for this?
Cheers,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Thatâs the correct syntax.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>
>> Hi,
>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>
>> # Put here your list of classes
>> #******
>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>> l 11 # Class number 2
>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>
>>
>> Kindly see my problem.
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Regards,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>
>>> Please find it now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the
>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>> let
>>>>>> us
>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#12 |
Well they are a lot of possibilities:
1) Do you have other plot? or do not succeed to have any plot?
If you do not have any plot, then it means that you have a problem with the plotting program.
maybe a 32/64 bit incompatibility.
2) You do not have any particles with those ID in your lhe file.
In that case, obviously you will not see anything.
It means that either you do not look at the process that you think.
You look at plot at parton level right? (no shower/
3) Do you have the plot but do not see any structure for the MET one?
Then either the range is not good enough and/or that you do not have any MET on that range at all.
This is likely to point to a physics problem than a code problem.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 13:52, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for your reply.
> I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
> What may be the reason for this?
>
> Cheers,
> Deepanjali
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Thatâs the correct syntax.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>>
>>> # Put here your list of classes
>>> #******
>>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>>> l 11 # Class number 2
>>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
>>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>
>>>
>>> Kindly see my problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>> Regards,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>>
>>>> Please find it now.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did not
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of the
>>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting as
>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with new
>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#13 |
Hi,
Thank you very much for your nice explanation.
1) yes, I do have other plot except mET.
2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for my
analysis part.
I look at the plot at parton level only.
3)No, I neither have plot nor structure for MET. I checked with different
range for this purpose. Still same problem sustains.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Well they are a lot of possibilities:
>
> 1) Do you have other plot? or do not succeed to have any plot?
> If you do not have any plot, then it means that you have a problem with
> the plotting program.
> maybe a 32/64 bit incompatibility.
> > 2) You do not have any particles with those ID in your lhe file.
> > In that case, obviously you will not see anything.
> It means that either you do not look at the process that you think.
> You look at plot at parton level right? (no shower/
> > 3) Do you have the plot but do not see any structure for the MET one?
> > Then either the range is not good enough and/or that you do not have any
> MET on that range at all.
> This is likely to point to a physics problem than a code problem.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 13:52, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
>> What may be the reason for this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> ThatâÂÂs the correct syntax.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>>>
>>>> # Put here your list of classes
>>>> #******
>>>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>>>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>>>> l 11 # Class number 2
>>>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
>>>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kindly see my problem.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find it now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>>>> the meaning
>>>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with
>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>> let
>>>>>> us
>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#14 |
Hi,
> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for my
> analysis part.
> I look at the plot at parton level only.
Can you copy paste here one of the events of the lhe file produced by madgraph.
This is the information which is read to make the plot.
With one event, we will be able to compute manually the associate MET and check where it should be on the plot.
If this is zero then it will explains your plot.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 16:17, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you very much for your nice explanation.
>
> 1) yes, I do have other plot except mET.
>
> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for my
> analysis part.
> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>
> 3)No, I neither have plot nor structure for MET. I checked with different
> range for this purpose. Still same problem sustains.
>
> Thank you very much.
> Regards,
> Deepanjali
>
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Well they are a lot of possibilities:
>>
>> 1) Do you have other plot? or do not succeed to have any plot?
>> If you do not have any plot, then it means that you have a problem with
>> the plotting program.
>> maybe a 32/64 bit incompatibility.
>>> 2) You do not have any particles with those ID in your lhe file.
>>> In that case, obviously you will not see anything.
>> It means that either you do not look at the process that you think.
>> You look at plot at parton level right? (no shower/
>>> 3) Do you have the plot but do not see any structure for the MET one?
>>> Then either the range is not good enough and/or that you do not have any
>> MET on that range at all.
>> This is likely to point to a physics problem than a code problem.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 13:52, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>> I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
>>> What may be the reason for this?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>> ThatâÂÂs the correct syntax.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>>>>
>>>>> # Put here your list of classes
>>>>> #******
>>>>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>>>>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>>>>> l 11 # Class number 2
>>>>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
>>>>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kindly see my problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find it now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in mET,
>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card? Can
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning
>>>>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their PDG
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not detecting
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with
>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>>> us
>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#15 |
Hi,
I generated the process
generate e- e+ > tr+ tr-, (tr+ > w+ v,(w+ > j j)),(tr- > z e-,(z > j j))
these lines are copied from events.lhe file mentioned below,
<event>
12 1 0.1250815E-06 0.1000099E+04 0.7818608E-02 0.8684273E-01
11 -1 0 0 0 0 0.00000000000E+00 0.00000000000E+00
0.10000000000E+04 0.10000000000E+04 0.51100000000E-03 0. -1.
-11 -1 0 0 0 0 -0.00000000000E+00 -0.00000000000E+00
-0.10000000000E+04 0.10000000000E+04 0.51100000000E-03 0. 1.
-8000020 2 1 2 0 0 -0.82631427579E+03 -0.20928255296E+03
0.15601379746E+03 0.99990104099E+03 0.49886603153E+03 0. 0.
24 2 3 3 0 0 -0.25569365122E+03 0.13232338466E+03
-0.52992858062E+02 0.30277386761E+03 0.77298450843E+02 0. 0.
8000020 2 1 2 0 0 0.82631427579E+03 0.20928255296E+03
-0.15601379746E+03 0.10000989590E+04 0.49926260972E+03 0. 0.
23 2 5 5 0 0 0.87285499488E+02 0.12186526778E+03
-0.18864410289E+03 0.25520295903E+03 0.84095486391E+02 0. 0.
4 1 4 4 501 0 -0.22295008074E+03 0.99738924605E+02
-0.69130998776E+02 0.25384188578E+03 0.14200000000E+01 0. -1.
-3 1 4 4 0 501 -0.32743570479E+02 0.32584460053E+02
0.16138140714E+02 0.48931981835E+02 0.10400000000E+00 0. 1.
8000012 1 3 3 0 0 -0.57062062457E+03 -0.34160593762E+03
0.20900665552E+03 0.69712717338E+03 0.00000000000E+00 0. -1.
4 1 6 6 502 0 0.51131610249E+02 0.72396853225E+01
-0.55107625793E+02 0.75536225950E+02 0.14200000000E+01 0. 1.
-4 1 6 6 0 502 0.36153889239E+02 0.11462558246E+03
-0.13353647709E+03 0.17966673308E+03 0.14200000000E+01 0. -1.
11 1 5 5 0 0 0.73902877631E+03 0.87417285181E+02
0.32630305424E+02 0.74489599998E+03 0.51100000000E-03 0. -1.
<mgrwt>
<rscale> 0 0.10000990E+
<asrwt>0</asrwt>
<pdfrwt beam="1"> 1 11 0.10000000E+01 0.10000990E+
<pdfrwt beam="2"> 1 -11 0.10000000E+01 0.10000990E+
<totfact> 0.10000000E+
</mgrwt>
Hope it will help you to resolve the problem.
Thanking you.
Cheers,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
>> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
>> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for
>> my
>> analysis part.
>> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>
> Can you copy paste here one of the events of the lhe file produced by
> madgraph.
> This is the information which is read to make the plot.
> With one event, we will be able to compute manually the associate MET and
> check where it should be on the plot.
> If this is zero then it will explains your plot.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 16:17, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your nice explanation.
>>
>> 1) yes, I do have other plot except mET.
>>
>> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
>> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for
>> my
>> analysis part.
>> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>>
>> 3)No, I neither have plot nor structure for MET. I checked with
>> different
>> range for this purpose. Still same problem sustains.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>> Regards,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> Well they are a lot of possibilities:
>>>
>>> 1) Do you have other plot? or do not succeed to have any plot?
>>> If you do not have any plot, then it means that you have a problem with
>>> the plotting program.
>>> maybe a 32/64 bit incompatibility.
>>>> 2) You do not have any particles with those ID in your lhe file.
>>>> In that case, obviously you will not see anything.
>>> It means that either you do not look at the process that you think.
>>> You look at plot at parton level right? (no
>>> shower/
>>>> 3) Do you have the plot but do not see any structure for the MET one?
>>>> Then either the range is not good enough and/or that you do not have
>>>> any
>>> MET on that range at all.
>>> This is likely to point to a physics problem than a code problem.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 13:52, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>> I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
>>>> What may be the reason for this?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>> ThatâÃÂÃÂs the correct syntax.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # Put here your list of classes
>>>>>> #******
>>>>>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>>>>>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>>>>>> l 11 # Class number 2
>>>>>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
>>>>>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kindly see my problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please find it now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in
>>>>>>>>>>> mET,
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in
>>>>>>>>>>> mET,
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card?
>>>>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDG
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> detecting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
|
Revision history for this message
|
#16 |
Hi,
Ok your events indeed has some non zero missing et.
So I do not know.
The only work around then I can see is then to use another code to make that plot.
you can use madanalysis5
or write your own routine with matplotlib by using the lhe_parser class of madgraph.
Cheers,
Olivier
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 06:07, Deepanjali Goswami <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
> I generated the process
> generate e- e+ > tr+ tr-, (tr+ > w+ v,(w+ > j j)),(tr- > z e-,(z > j j))
>
> these lines are copied from events.lhe file mentioned below,
>
> <event>
> 12 1 0.1250815E-06 0.1000099E+04 0.7818608E-02 0.8684273E-01
> 11 -1 0 0 0 0 0.00000000000E+00 0.00000000000E+00
> 0.10000000000E+04 0.10000000000E+04 0.51100000000E-03 0. -1.
> -11 -1 0 0 0 0 -0.00000000000E+00 -0.00000000000E+00
> -0.10000000000E+04 0.10000000000E+04 0.51100000000E-03 0. 1.
> -8000020 2 1 2 0 0 -0.82631427579E+03 -0.20928255296E+03
> 0.15601379746E+03 0.99990104099E+03 0.49886603153E+03 0. 0.
> 24 2 3 3 0 0 -0.25569365122E+03 0.13232338466E+03
> -0.52992858062E+02 0.30277386761E+03 0.77298450843E+02 0. 0.
> 8000020 2 1 2 0 0 0.82631427579E+03 0.20928255296E+03
> -0.15601379746E+03 0.10000989590E+04 0.49926260972E+03 0. 0.
> 23 2 5 5 0 0 0.87285499488E+02 0.12186526778E+03
> -0.18864410289E+03 0.25520295903E+03 0.84095486391E+02 0. 0.
> 4 1 4 4 501 0 -0.22295008074E+03 0.99738924605E+02
> -0.69130998776E+02 0.25384188578E+03 0.14200000000E+01 0. -1.
> -3 1 4 4 0 501 -0.32743570479E+02 0.32584460053E+02
> 0.16138140714E+02 0.48931981835E+02 0.10400000000E+00 0. 1.
> 8000012 1 3 3 0 0 -0.57062062457E+03 -0.34160593762E+03
> 0.20900665552E+03 0.69712717338E+03 0.00000000000E+00 0. -1.
> 4 1 6 6 502 0 0.51131610249E+02 0.72396853225E+01
> -0.55107625793E+02 0.75536225950E+02 0.14200000000E+01 0. 1.
> -4 1 6 6 0 502 0.36153889239E+02 0.11462558246E+03
> -0.13353647709E+03 0.17966673308E+03 0.14200000000E+01 0. -1.
> 11 1 5 5 0 0 0.73902877631E+03 0.87417285181E+02
> 0.32630305424E+02 0.74489599998E+03 0.51100000000E-03 0. -1.
> <mgrwt>
> <rscale> 0 0.10000990E+
> <asrwt>0</asrwt>
> <pdfrwt beam="1"> 1 11 0.10000000E+01 0.10000990E+
> <pdfrwt beam="2"> 1 -11 0.10000000E+01 0.10000990E+
> <totfact> 0.10000000E+
> </mgrwt>
>
> Hope it will help you to resolve the problem.
>
> Thanking you.
> Cheers,
> Deepanjali
>
>
>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
>>> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for
>>> my
>>> analysis part.
>>> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>>
>> Can you copy paste here one of the events of the lhe file produced by
>> madgraph.
>> This is the information which is read to make the plot.
>> With one event, we will be able to compute manually the associate MET and
>> check where it should be on the plot.
>> If this is zero then it will explains your plot.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 16:17, Deepanjali Goswami
>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your nice explanation.
>>>
>>> 1) yes, I do have other plot except mET.
>>>
>>> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
>>> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process for
>>> my
>>> analysis part.
>>> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>>>
>>> 3)No, I neither have plot nor structure for MET. I checked with
>>> different
>>> range for this purpose. Still same problem sustains.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much.
>>> Regards,
>>> Deepanjali
>>>
>>>
>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>> Well they are a lot of possibilities:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Do you have other plot? or do not succeed to have any plot?
>>>> If you do not have any plot, then it means that you have a problem with
>>>> the plotting program.
>>>> maybe a 32/64 bit incompatibility.
>>>>> 2) You do not have any particles with those ID in your lhe file.
>>>>> In that case, obviously you will not see anything.
>>>> It means that either you do not look at the process that you think.
>>>> You look at plot at parton level right? (no
>>>> shower/
>>>>> 3) Do you have the plot but do not see any structure for the MET one?
>>>>> Then either the range is not good enough and/or that you do not have
>>>>> any
>>>> MET on that range at all.
>>>> This is likely to point to a physics problem than a code problem.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 13:52, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>> I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
>>>>> What may be the reason for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>
>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>> ThatâÃÂÃÂs the correct syntax.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # Put here your list of classes
>>>>>>> #******
>>>>>>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>>>>>>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>>>>>>> l 11 # Class number 2
>>>>>>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is reserved
>>>>>>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kindly see my problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please find it now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>>>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in
>>>>>>>>>>>> mET,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check it.
>>>>>>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in
>>>>>>>>>>>> mET,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I did
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class, name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detecting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>>> us
>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>> us
>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>
>> --
>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
>> know that it is solved:
>> https:/
>>
>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>> following page to enter your feedback:
>> https:/
>>
>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
|
Revision history for this message
|
#17 |
Hi,
I could get the plot of missing energy for type-III seesaw model.
Thank you very much for your all suggestions.
Now may I ask you, does Madgraph have any syntax to find invariant missing
energy ? I am not able to get the distribution. Or do I have to define it
in plot card?
I hope you will Kindly suggest me way to solve the problem.
Thanking you.
Cheers,
Deepanjali
> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
> https:/
>
> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
> Hi,
>
> Ok your events indeed has some non zero missing et.
> So I do not know.
> The only work around then I can see is then to use another code to make
> that plot.
>
> you can use madanalysis5
> or write your own routine with matplotlib by using the lhe_parser class of
> madgraph.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>> On Dec 30, 2015, at 06:07, Deepanjali Goswami
>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>> https:/
>>
>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>> Hi,
>> I generated the process
>> generate e- e+ > tr+ tr-, (tr+ > w+ v,(w+ > j j)),(tr- > z e-,(z > j j))
>>
>> these lines are copied from events.lhe file mentioned below,
>>
>> <event>
>> 12 1 0.1250815E-06 0.1000099E+04 0.7818608E-02 0.8684273E-01
>> 11 -1 0 0 0 0 0.00000000000E+00 0.00000000000E+00
>> 0.10000000000E+04 0.10000000000E+04 0.51100000000E-03 0. -1.
>> -11 -1 0 0 0 0 -0.00000000000E+00 -0.00000000000E+00
>> -0.10000000000E+04 0.10000000000E+04 0.51100000000E-03 0. 1.
>> -8000020 2 1 2 0 0 -0.82631427579E+03 -0.20928255296E+03
>> 0.15601379746E+03 0.99990104099E+03 0.49886603153E+03 0. 0.
>> 24 2 3 3 0 0 -0.25569365122E+03 0.13232338466E+03
>> -0.52992858062E+02 0.30277386761E+03 0.77298450843E+02 0. 0.
>> 8000020 2 1 2 0 0 0.82631427579E+03 0.20928255296E+03
>> -0.15601379746E+03 0.10000989590E+04 0.49926260972E+03 0. 0.
>> 23 2 5 5 0 0 0.87285499488E+02 0.12186526778E+03
>> -0.18864410289E+03 0.25520295903E+03 0.84095486391E+02 0. 0.
>> 4 1 4 4 501 0 -0.22295008074E+03 0.99738924605E+02
>> -0.69130998776E+02 0.25384188578E+03 0.14200000000E+01 0. -1.
>> -3 1 4 4 0 501 -0.32743570479E+02 0.32584460053E+02
>> 0.16138140714E+02 0.48931981835E+02 0.10400000000E+00 0. 1.
>> 8000012 1 3 3 0 0 -0.57062062457E+03 -0.34160593762E+03
>> 0.20900665552E+03 0.69712717338E+03 0.00000000000E+00 0. -1.
>> 4 1 6 6 502 0 0.51131610249E+02 0.72396853225E+01
>> -0.55107625793E+02 0.75536225950E+02 0.14200000000E+01 0. 1.
>> -4 1 6 6 0 502 0.36153889239E+02 0.11462558246E+03
>> -0.13353647709E+03 0.17966673308E+03 0.14200000000E+01 0. -1.
>> 11 1 5 5 0 0 0.73902877631E+03 0.87417285181E+02
>> 0.32630305424E+02 0.74489599998E+03 0.51100000000E-03 0. -1.
>> <mgrwt>
>> <rscale> 0 0.10000990E+
>> <asrwt>0</asrwt>
>> <pdfrwt beam="1"> 1 11 0.10000000E+01 0.10000990E+
>> <pdfrwt beam="2"> 1 -11 0.10000000E+01 0.10000990E+
>> <totfact> 0.10000000E+
>> </mgrwt>
>>
>> Hope it will help you to resolve the problem.
>>
>> Thanking you.
>> Cheers,
>> Deepanjali
>>
>>
>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
>>>> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process
>>>> for
>>>> my
>>>> analysis part.
>>>> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>>>
>>> Can you copy paste here one of the events of the lhe file produced by
>>> madgraph.
>>> This is the information which is read to make the plot.
>>> With one event, we will be able to compute manually the associate MET
>>> and
>>> check where it should be on the plot.
>>> If this is zero then it will explains your plot.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 16:17, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>> https:/
>>>>
>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your nice explanation.
>>>>
>>>> 1) yes, I do have other plot except mET.
>>>>
>>>> 2) How can I have these ID's in type-III seesaw model lhe file??
>>>> It may be a possible reason. Anyhow I will have to see this process
>>>> for
>>>> my
>>>> analysis part.
>>>> I look at the plot at parton level only.
>>>>
>>>> 3)No, I neither have plot nor structure for MET. I checked with
>>>> different
>>>> range for this purpose. Still same problem sustains.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>> Well they are a lot of possibilities:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Do you have other plot? or do not succeed to have any plot?
>>>>> If you do not have any plot, then it means that you have a problem
>>>>> with
>>>>> the plotting program.
>>>>> maybe a 32/64 bit incompatibility.
>>>>>> 2) You do not have any particles with those ID in your lhe file.
>>>>>> In that case, obviously you will not see anything.
>>>>> It means that either you do not look at the process that you think.
>>>>> You look at plot at parton level right? (no
>>>>> shower/
>>>>>> 3) Do you have the plot but do not see any structure for the MET
>>>>>> one?
>>>>>> Then either the range is not good enough and/or that you do not have
>>>>>> any
>>>>> MET on that range at all.
>>>>> This is likely to point to a physics problem than a code problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 13:52, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>>> I am still not getting plots with syntex for mET.
>>>>>> What may be the reason for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:22, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> If you are still not getting the attachment, I am writing it here
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # Put here your list of classes
>>>>>>>> #******
>>>>>>>> # Do NOT put spaces before class names!
>>>>>>>> # Begin Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>>>> jet 1 -1 2 -2 3 -3 4 -4 21 # Class number 1
>>>>>>>> l 11 # Class number 2
>>>>>>>> mET 8000012 8000014 8000016 # Missing ET class, name is
>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>> # End Classes # This is TAG. Do not modify this line
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kindly see my problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> I am really sorry, somehow attachment did not go.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please find it now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They are no attachment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:46, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have attached the plot_card.dat along with the mail.
>>>>>>>>>>> Where I defined the mET.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attachment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanking You.
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mET,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not give any plot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you show me the line that you put? Such that I can check
>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This should be the only place where to do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> (and it works for me)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 27, 2015, at 06:21, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried earlier with new particle(neutrino) PDG notation in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mET,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did not me any plot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I will have to define it somewhere else also. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And how can I define PT of all missing particle in plot card?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> plz
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanking you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mET 12 -12 14 -14 16 -16 1000022 # Missing ET class,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reserved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can put the pdg that you want on that line, the meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mET
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class is special.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThatÃÂ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the meaning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 18:12, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali Goswami proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, I proposed the list of unobserved particles with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> card of type-III seesaw. But problem is that its not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detecting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy since missing energy is already defined with the SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is also mentioned that it cant be edited.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I am facing problem with definition of missing energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deepanjali
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO changed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Open => Answered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier Mattelaer proposed the following answer:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you update the list of unobserved particles in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plot_card.dat?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 13:47, Deepanjali Goswami
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <email address hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New question #280118 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using type-III seesaw model in MAdgraph, my problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are three new neutrinos in this model, which can not be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> madanalysis plot card because its defined only for SM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do I define missing transverse energ, missing transverse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> momentum
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neutrinos in this model? Please help me out in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an
>>>>>>>>>>> answer
>>>>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to
>>>>>>> let
>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>>>> https:/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>>>> us
>>>>> know that it is solved:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>>>> https:/
>>>>>
>>>>> You received this question notification because you asked the
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>>>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let
>>> us
>>> know that it is solved:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
>>> following page to enter your feedback:
>>> https:/
>>>
>>> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this question notification because you are an answer
>> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
Can you help with this problem?
Provide an answer of your own, or ask Deepanjali Goswami for more information if necessary.
