Pythia6Q shower @100tev

Asked by Michele Selvaggi

Hi guys,

I am trying to generate p p > t t~ events at NLO at 100 tev with pythia6q shower and the generation crashes (*).
I am using the last version MG5_aMC_2_2_1 and the default run_card and parameter _card (just changing ECM and shower)
It seems that the program is failing due to some problems with PDFs.
I would like to simply compare Herwig and Pythia6 shower, but leaving the rest unchanged.

Can you suggest some fix?

Thanks,
Michele

(*) Error:

----------------------------------------------------
INFO: P0_uux_ttx done.
INFO: P0_uxu_ttx done.
Exception AttributeError: AttributeError("'_DummyThread' object has no attribute '_Thread__block'",) in <module 'threading' from '/nfs/soft/python/python-2.7.3-sl5_amd64_gcc41/lib/python2.7/threading.pyo'> ignored
Exception AttributeError: AttributeError("'_DummyThread' object has no attribute '_Thread__block'",) in <module 'threading' from '/nfs/soft/python/python-2.7.3-sl5_amd64_gcc41/lib/python2.7/threading.pyo'> ignored
INFO: P0_gg_ttx done.
INFO: Checking test output:
INFO: P0_gg_ttx
INFO: Result for test_ME:
INFO: Passed.
INFO: Result for test_MC:
INFO: Output of the failing test:
 Enter the Monte Carlo name: possible choices are
 HERWIG6, HERWIGPP, PYTHIA6Q, PYTHIA6PT, PYTHIA8
 Enter 0 to compute MC/MC(limit)
       1 to compute MC/ME(limit)
 Enter alpha, beta for G_soft
   Enter alpha<0 to set G_soft=1 (no ME soft)
 Enter alpha, beta for G_azi
   Enter alpha>0 to set G_azi=0 (no azi corr)
 Enter xi_i, y_ij to be used in coll/soft tests
  Enter -2 to generate them randomly
 Enter number of tests for soft and collinear limits
 Sum over helicity (0), or random helicity (1)

 ****************************************************
 ****************************************************
             Testing limits for PYTHIA6Q
 ****************************************************
 ****************************************************

 A PDF is used, so alpha_s(MZ) is going to be modified
 Old value of alpha_s from param_card: 0.11799999999999999
  ****************************************

       NNPDFDriver version 1.0.3
   Grid: NNPDF23nlo_as_0119_qed_mem0.grid
  ****************************************
 New value of alpha_s from PDF nn23nlo: 0.11899999999999999
 Give FKS configuration number ("0" loops over all)

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 1
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 1
 with PDGs: i= 21 j= 21

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs
Using random seed offsets: 0 , 1 , 0
  with seed 34
 Ranmar initialization seeds 13167 9409
nFKSprocess: 1. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 1. Lower bound for tau is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 1. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 2. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 2. Lower bound for tau is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 2. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 3. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 3. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 4. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 4. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 5. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 5. Lower bound for tau is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 5. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 6. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 6. Lower bound for tau is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 6. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 7. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 7. Lower bound for tau is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 7. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 8. Absolute lower bound for tau at the Born is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 8. Lower bound for tau is 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06
nFKSprocess: 8. Lower bound for tau is (taking resonances into account) 0.11972E-04 0.34600E+03 0.10000E+06

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 1 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 Collinear tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 50
Collinear test 1 FAILED. Fraction of failures: 0.50

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 2
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 2
 with PDGs: i= 21 j= 21

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 2 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 Collinear tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 50
Collinear test 2 FAILED. Fraction of failures: 0.50

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 3
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 3
 with PDGs: i= 21 j= 6

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 3 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 No collinear test for massive j_fks

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 4
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 4
 with PDGs: i= 21 j= -6

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 4 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 No collinear test for massive j_fks

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 5
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 1
 with PDGs: i= -1 j= -1

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 5 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 Collinear tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 51
Collinear test 5 FAILED. Fraction of failures: 0.51

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 6
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 1
 with PDGs: i= 1 j= 1

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 6 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 Collinear tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 58
Collinear test 6 FAILED. Fraction of failures: 0.58

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 7
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 2
 with PDGs: i= -1 j= -1

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 7 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 Collinear tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 59
Collinear test 7 FAILED. Fraction of failures: 0.59

 =================================================

 NEW FKS CONFIGURATION:
 FKS configuration number is 8
 FKS partons are: i= 5 j= 2
 with PDGs: i= 1 j= 1

 Enter graph number (iconfig), '0' loops over all graphs

 Soft tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 0
     Soft test 8 PASSED. Fraction of failures: 0.00

 Collinear tests done for (Born) config 1
 Failures: 61
Collinear test 8 FAILED. Fraction of failures: 0.61
Error detected in "launch auto "
write debug file /nfs/user/mselvaggi/MG5_aMC_v2_2_1/tt_nlo_py/run_03_tag_1_debug.log
If you need help with this issue please contact us on https://answers.launchpad.net/madgraph5
aMCatNLOError : Some tests failed, run cannot continue.
 Please check that widths of final state particles (e.g. top) have been set to 0 in the param_card.dat.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
Rikkert Frederix Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Paolo Torrielli (paolo-torrielli) said :
#1

Hi Michele,
thanks for spotting this problem out.
The issue was due to a small bug in the testing routine, related to an improper setting of a shower boundary condition.
The following patch should solve it:

=== modified file 'Template/NLO/SubProcesses/symmetry_fks_test_MC.f'
--- Template/NLO/SubProcesses/symmetry_fks_test_MC.f 2014-06-26 08:45:41 +0000
+++ Template/NLO/SubProcesses/symmetry_fks_test_MC.f 2014-10-06 16:07:28 +0000
@@ -144,6 +144,13 @@

       character*10 MonteCarlo
       common/cMonteCarloType/MonteCarlo
+
+ double precision shower_S_scale(fks_configs*2)
+ & ,shower_H_scale(fks_configs*2),ref_H_scale(fks_configs*2)
+ & ,pt_hardness
+ common /cshowerscale2/shower_S_scale,shower_H_scale,ref_H_scale
+ & ,pt_hardness
+
 c integer icomp
 c
 c DATA
@@ -371,6 +378,10 @@

          call set_cms_stuff(0)
          calculatedBorn=.false.
+
+c Initialise shower_S_scale to a large value, not to get spurious dead zones
+ shower_S_scale=1d20
+
          if(ilim.eq.0)then
            call xmcsubt_wrap(p1_cnt(0,1,0),zero,y_ij_fks_ev,fxl)
          else

Let me know if it works.
Cheers.
Paolo

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Michele Selvaggi for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.