No events with Ecm below intermediate on-shell threshold when using parton distribution functions

Asked by Wouter van den Wollenberg

I am trying to look at the behaviour of the cross section of a g g > b b~ a a process using the heft model. Specifcally I am interested in the so-called triangle diagram; the one containing a single ggh coupling. To this end I have toyed with the coupling orders in the heft model in order to eliminate all diagrams except one where we have g g > h > h h > b b~ a a.

This diagram was generated using: g g > b b~ a a and then a list of coupling orders (which I added myself in order to switch off unwanted diagrams, i.e. it is a modified version of the MG heft one) set to zero. I use a dR cut on the b's and photons of 0.4 (so on (b,a), (a,a) and (b,b)), in addition I use an eta cut of 2.5 and an pT cut of 10 GeV on the b's and photons.

If I disable pdfs and set the total energy to any energy (including those below the double Higgs production threshold of 250 GeV (the Higgs mass was set to 125 GeV)) I get a cross section which corresponds very well to the theoretical result.

However if I include pdfs, set the total energy to 14 TeV, generate events, and then later on look at the Ecm distribution (using MadAnalysis as well as my own root analysis of the .lhe output), I see no events below 250 GeV. This is a bit strange; especially since without pdfs there was no problem generating below 250 GeV, and I have not used the decay chain formalism whilst generating the diagram, so off-shell Higgses should be allowed.

At first I thought that there was perhaps some setting forcing the Higgses to be on-shell, but if I lower the total energy to something lower like 400 GeV, I do get events with an Ecm below 250 GeV. The threshold also moves with the Higgs mass, so setting the Higgs mass to something like 25 GeV makes it so that no events are generated below 50 GeV for a total energy of 14 TeV.

Am I missing some setting or something? I would very much like to access the Ecm regime below 250 GeV using pdfs.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#1

Hi Wouter,

I've computed the cross-section for the following two syntax in the heft:
g g > h h, h > b b~, h > a a
and
g g > h , h > b b~ a a / z a b
They both results in the same (unique) diagram but with different on-shell particles.
The first one give a cross-section of 5e-6, while the second is at: 2e-12
So in order to expect one events with an invariant mass lower than 2*mh, you need to generate more than a million of events.

Now going to physical meaning, note that the approximation of the heft model doesn't work for a pair production:
Please look at:
http://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/~alaureys/gg_hh/gg_hh.html

Cheers,

Olivier

On Aug 18, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Wouter van den Wollenberg <email address hidden> wrote:

> Question #234228 on MadGraph5 changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/madgraph5/+question/234228
>
> Description changed to:
> I am trying to look at the behaviour of the cross section of a g g > b
> b~ a a process using the heft model. Specifcally I am interested in the
> so-called triangle diagram; the one containing a single ggh coupling. To
> this end I have toyed with the coupling orders in the heft model in
> order to eliminate all diagrams except one where we have g g > h > h h >
> b b~ a a.
>
> This diagram was generated using: g g > b b~ a a and then a list of
> coupling orders (which I added myself in order to switch off unwanted
> diagrams, i.e. it is a modified version of the MG heft one) set to zero.
> I use a dR cut on the b's and photons of 0.4 (so on (b,a), (a,a) and
> (b,b)), in addition I use an eta cut of 2.5 and an pT cut of 10 GeV on
> the b's and photons.
>
> If I disable pdfs and set the total energy to any energy (including
> those below the double Higgs production threshold of 250 GeV (the Higgs
> mass was set to 125 GeV)) I get a cross section which corresponds very
> well to the theoretical result.
>
> However if I include pdfs, set the total energy to 14 TeV, generate
> events, and then later on look at the Ecm distribution (using
> MadAnalysis as well as my own root analysis of the .lhe output), I see
> no events below 250 GeV. This is a bit strange; especially since without
> pdfs there was no problem generating below 250 GeV, and I have not used
> the decay chain formalism whilst generating the diagram, so off-shell
> Higgses should be allowed.
>
> At first I thought that there was perhaps some setting forcing the
> Higgses to be on-shell, but if I lower the total energy to something
> lower like 400 GeV, I do get events with an Ecm below 250 GeV. The
> threshold also moves with the Higgs mass, so setting the Higgs mass to
> something like 25 GeV makes it so that no events are generated below 50
> GeV for a total energy of 14 TeV.
>
> Am I missing some setting or something? I would very much like to access
> the Ecm regime below 250 GeV using pdfs.
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> MadTeam, which is an answer contact for MadGraph5.

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Wouter van den Wollenberg for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.