Number of bugs worked on

Asked by gf

Hello,
How can I see the number of bugs I have worked on?

I started bug triaging 3 months ago and have been working to clear up old bug reports.

Steps I use to calculate my personal stats:
1. In my profile page I go to advanced search,
2. Select all statuses
3. Under "commenter" box, I select "pick Me"
4. Click Search

Expected results: it should show the number of bugs I have worked on (left comments on).

Actual results: the results total is much higher than expected. It is counting the number of packages in each bug.

For example, if I work/comment on 1 bug report that has two packages associated with it, the search results counts that as two bugs.

As of today, my personal total results according to Launchpad is 1,747 bug reports
My estimate is the total should be about 1,388 bug reports

Is there any way to see the total number of bug reports I have worked on?
Thanks
G

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Launchpad itself Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Colin Watson
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) said :
#1

This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.

Revision history for this message
gf (gf-interlinks-deactivatedaccount) said :
#2

No answer?

G

Revision history for this message
gf (gf-interlinks-deactivatedaccount) said :
#3

Should I file this as a bug rather than a question?

Revision history for this message
Best Colin Watson (cjwatson) said :
#4

Yes, the search is for bug *tasks*, not bugs. If you have this sort of specialised requirement, you're probably best writing something to fetch the data from the Launchpad API:

  https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib

Revision history for this message
gf (gf-interlinks-deactivatedaccount) said :
#5

Thanks for the information, Colin. I will look into the API.
:)
G

Revision history for this message
gf (gf-interlinks-deactivatedaccount) said :
#6

Thanks Colin Watson, that solved my question.