Launchpad itself

Open Source license review criteria?

Asked by Mark Lee

Apparently the Awn Extras project <https://launchpad.net/awn-extras> has been marked as proprietary, and I am unsure why. We are an open source project using the following DFSG-compliant licenses: GPL-2(+), LGPL-2.1(+), and CC-3.0-BY-SA. We have removed code with unclear copyright assignment months ago, and recently removed bundled code which is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (although that is considered DFSG-compliant).

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Launchpad itself Edit question
Assignee:
Brad Crittenden Edit question
Solved by:
Brad Crittenden
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Ursula Junque (ursinha) said : 		#1

Hi Mark,

It seems you're right, that license is indeed compliant to Launchpad. What exactly you mean by "Unported" when referring to the CC-BY-SA license?

Thanks for pointing that,

Ursula

Revision history for this message
Mark Lee (malept) said : 		#2

It refers to the following license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

...which, AIUI, does not have country-specific legal language. See also:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#Further_Internationalization

Revision history for this message
Данило Шеган (danilo) said : 		#3

Is the issue solved now (as I believe it is)?

Revision history for this message
Mark Lee (malept) said : 		#4

Nope, Awn Extras is still marked as proprietary.

Revision history for this message
Best Brad Crittenden (bac) said : 		#5

Your licensing has been approved and the project is no longer marked as proprietary.

Revision history for this message
Mark Lee (malept) said : 		#6

Thanks Brad Crittenden, that solved my question.