ubuntu should be using open source software for all its functions. The current situation is contradicts "Ubuntu Philosophy" (at http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/philosophy ) in that "our work on Ubuntu is driven by a philosophy on software freedom" but we're still using a proprietary software to manage Ubuntu. The use of malone as it is now also contradicts "Ubuntu Licensing" (at http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/licensing ), especially by forcing "The Ubuntu team [who] is committed to Free and Open Source Software" to use a proprietary software.
ubuntu should be using open source software for all its functions. The current situation is contradicts "Ubuntu Philosophy" (at http:// www.ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ philosophy ) in that "our work on Ubuntu is driven by a philosophy on software freedom" but we're still using a proprietary software to manage Ubuntu. The use of malone as it is now also contradicts "Ubuntu Licensing" (at http:// www.ubuntu. com/ubuntu/ licensing ), especially by forcing "The Ubuntu team [who] is committed to Free and Open Source Software" to use a proprietary software.
I also agree with https:/ /launchpad. net/products/ launchpad/ +bug/50699/ comments/ 4 in that
> If tomorrow Canonical dissapears (I'll pray to the Flying Spaghetti Monster so that it does
> not happen), what will happend to our work?
I also propose the severity of this bug bumped up as it endangers the future of Ubuntu development, as illustrated by the above comment.