So from the thread I read on -users that referred to this bug, ISTM that the main issue this causes is that you can't use the tarball to reimport. Is that true? And if so, could we just make it so the importer was able to detect and process tarballs that have this filename/structure?
So from the thread I read on -users that referred to this bug, ISTM that the main issue this causes is that you can't use the tarball to reimport. Is that true? And if so, could we just make it so the importer was able to detect and process tarballs that have this filename/structure?