On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Johan Engelen <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am sorry, probably I don't understand the complete issue. Hope this adds something:
> I am a big user of snapping, but I always use geometrical snapping. I definitely want *nodes* snapping during scaling (rectangles, paths, whatever). When that functionality is maintained, I am happy.
So, do you also use geometric bbox? If you do, there'll be no loss of
functionality for you. If not, why?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Johan Engelen <email address hidden> wrote:
> I am sorry, probably I don't understand the complete issue. Hope this adds something:
> I am a big user of snapping, but I always use geometrical snapping. I definitely want *nodes* snapping during scaling (rectangles, paths, whatever). When that functionality is maintained, I am happy.
So, do you also use geometric bbox? If you do, there'll be no loss of
functionality for you. If not, why?