On 2014-01-16 18:01 +0100, jazzynico wrote:
> Note that it could break non-stock icon themes that don't follow the
> changes in the gtk icons naming (that's the case with the faenza icon
> theme on Crunchbang; the missing icons are replaced with the default
> stock-icons).
Redo/undo changes of the patch also affect default Gnome icon theme (GTK+/Quartz 2.24.22, glib2 2.38.2, gnome-icon-theme 3.10.0): the fallback built-in icon is used instead of the one from the Gnome icon theme.
What about interfaces using RTL instead of LTR? IIRC this issue came up on one of the gtk mailing lists too, recently (AFAIU the recent GTK+ and glib changes to remove stock items broke interface choices of quite a few GTK+ apps (outside of the Gnome world)).
On 2014-01-16 18:01 +0100, jazzynico wrote:
> Note that it could break non-stock icon themes that don't follow the
> changes in the gtk icons naming (that's the case with the faenza icon
> theme on Crunchbang; the missing icons are replaced with the default
> stock-icons).
Redo/undo changes of the patch also affect default Gnome icon theme (GTK+/Quartz 2.24.22, glib2 2.38.2, gnome-icon-theme 3.10.0): the fallback built-in icon is used instead of the one from the Gnome icon theme.
> - INKSCAPE_ ICON("edit- undo")) , ICON("edit- undo-ltr" )),
> + INKSCAPE_
What about interfaces using RTL instead of LTR? IIRC this issue came up on one of the gtk mailing lists too, recently (AFAIU the recent GTK+ and glib changes to remove stock items broke interface choices of quite a few GTK+ apps (outside of the Gnome world)).