Comment 7 for bug 1183206

Revision history for this message
su_v (suv-lp) wrote :

> There is no reason not to, (…)

The question was with regard to a possible danger of breaking other things - we don't really want to risk introducing regressions in stable. Thx, I'll commit the change to the stable branch lp:inkscape/0.48.x

> (…) we should have a collection of bugs to backport.

Not sure I understand - are you asking whether such a collection already exists?

Here it is:
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bugs?field.tag=backport-proposed>

Note: watch out for the milestones - the state 'Committed' refers to the milestone branch: several of the backport-proposed items have only been committed to trunk, others already to 0.48.x as well (some of them earlier today).

> The adobe files/security bug one should be too.

I won't touch that one ;) - but it certainly would be great it got backported to stable.