does "drag" boundary condition can't work with P1DGP2?
Hi all,
the manual metions in 8.12.3.11, does it means "drag" boundary condition can't work with P1DGP2?
But 8.16 and 8.16.6 sugguest P1DGP2 and both a type::drag and a type::no normal flow at bottom boundary condition.
I'm a liitle confused.
By the way, dose there any forum for Fluidity model users to communicate ?
Maybe who has some basic questions like me can search the information first before asking.
Please excuse my poor English. Thanks.
8.12.3.11 No normal flow
When using .../control volumes under Pressure .../spatial discretisation or when
using .../integrate continuity by parts with CG Pressure and Velocity this boundary condition
type imposes a weak no normal flow boundary condition on the surfaces specified.
8.16 Configuring ocean simulations
This section contains advice for running a large scale ocean simulation in three dimensions. The
flow domain is characterised by the large aspect ratio between horizontal and vertical length scales.
The following is a set of recommended discretisation options for such simulations. It is based on
the use of the P1DGP2 velocity, pressure element pair [Cotter et al., 2009]. The recommendations are
applicable to both global or ocean-scale domains as well as to smaller, regional or coastal domains.
For the first case, see the additional instructions in section 8.16.8, to solve the equations on the sphere.
8.16.6 Boundary conditions
For the bottom boundary condition, add both a type::drag and a type::no normal flow
boundary condition under Velocity. A typical value for a dimensionless bottom friction coefficientfor the ocean is 0.0025.
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Solved
- For:
- Fluidity Edit question
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Solved by:
- Matthew Piggott
- Solved:
- Last query:
- Last reply: