Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> That's the simple part... the hard parts are in keeping the cache and
> multiple URL's in sync, in doing checkpoint/restart, in additional
> asynchronism issues and probably some I have not thought about.
Not in the case of full backup. I propose to implement it first for the
full backup only and later, if somebody has enough of time, for
incremental backup. What do you think?
Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> That's the simple part... the hard parts are in keeping the cache and
> multiple URL's in sync, in doing checkpoint/restart, in additional
> asynchronism issues and probably some I have not thought about.
Not in the case of full backup. I propose to implement it first for the
full backup only and later, if somebody has enough of time, for
incremental backup. What do you think?
Cheers,
Jiri