Comment 31 for bug 1979244
Revision history for this message
| Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote | #31 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
To add to that. In the classic update-manager algorithm if 2 is in security and 3 in updates is not for us, like phasing at 0 or just random chance, 3 is considered a security update and installed anyway.
The problem being that at this point we cannot adjust which version we're going to install or we'd pick version 2 (like the pinning based implementation). I mean I guess we could try that in the future, but it's riskier in terms of setting the solver on 🔥.
Since image building does not yet respect phasing at all and can't until launchpad preserves previous unphased updates, and update-manager does not either for security updates, removals will always be preferable over PUP of 0.