Documentation question

Are you referring to the p grad(v) term? In that case it is there because v grad(p) (from the math books) has been integrated by parts and we have left out the resulting boundary term. (v grad(p) * dx = v * p * n * ds - p * div(v) * dx) Other than that I think its correct except from a few missing dots.

Best regards

Mikael

Den Aug 17, 2012 kl. 2:15 AM skrev Yaakoub El Khamra:

> Question #206052 on CBC.PDESys changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/cbcpdesys/+question/206052
>
> Description changed to:
> Please forgive the newbie question but does the equation on the 1st line here:
> http://fenicsproject.org/_images/math/48a63449f0ad994fd6fd773b76dd1fba66bd1efa.png
>
> seem a bit off or do I need to go back and hit the math books?
>
> The full tutorial page:
> http://fenicsproject.org/featured/2011/pdesys.html
>
> Regards
> Yaakoub
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for CBC.PDESys.

not quite, I was referring to the ":" in the middle of the expression. Is that just a typo?

That's a contraction of two second rank tensors. It's not a typo, google it:-)

Best regards

Mikael

Den 17. aug. 2012 kl. 16:11 skrev Yaakoub El Khamra <email address hidden>:

> Question #206052 on CBC.PDESys changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/cbcpdesys/+question/206052
>
> Status: Answered => Open
>
> Yaakoub El Khamra is still having a problem:
>
> not quite, I was referring to the ":" in the middle of the expression. Is that just a typo?
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for CBC.PDESys.

Back to the mathbooks for me. Thank you very much for your quick reply.