CalcHEP

Error during compiling batch script pcm_cycle

Asked by Muhammad Danish Aslam

I am using calchep_v3.7.5. I am trying to calculate cross section at different cm energies using pcm_cycle batch script for scattering process ZHH. Result file produces but from compilation process it seems there is some error.

danish@danish-Latitude-E7440:~/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/work/bin$ ./pcm_cycle 500 25 100
PROCESS: h->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile h->2*x
PROCESS: H->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile H->2*x
PROCESS: H3->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile H3->2*x
Pcm=500[GeV] sigma=6.1589E-05 1.45E-02[pb]
PROCESS: h->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile h->2*x
PROCESS: H->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile H->2*x
PROCESS: H3->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile H3->2*x
Pcm=5.250E+02[GeV] sigma=6.1981E-05 1.49E-02[pb]
PROCESS: h->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile h->2*x
PROCESS: H->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile H->2*x
PROCESS: H3->2*x
/home/danish/compiler/analysis/calchep_3.7.5/sbin/newProcess: 88: exit: Illegal number: -1
 Can not compile H3->2*x
Pcm=5.500E+02[GeV] sigma=6.2007E-05 1.52E-02[pb]
PROCESS: h->2*x

What is the problem here?? Kindly suggest solution. Thanks.

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
CalcHEP Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Muhammad Danish Aslam
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) said : 		#1

This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.

Revision history for this message
Alexander Belyaev (alexander.belyaev) said : 		#2

Dear Muhammad,

you should run this script from results folder where n_calchep binary for numerical calculations is located

../bin/pcm_cycle 500 25 20

Then you will get what you would expect, see below.
Please let me know if this solved the problem.
Regards
Alexander

sasha-laptop:~/calchep/work/results> ../bin/pcm_cycle 500 25 100
Pcm=500[GeV] sigma=1.3007E-04 1.54E-02[pb]
Pcm=5.250E+02[GeV] sigma=1.2373E-04 1.62E-02[pb]
Pcm=5.500E+02[GeV] sigma=1.1790E-04 1.69E-02[pb]
Pcm=5.750E+02[GeV] sigma=1.1243E-04 1.75E-02[pb]
Pcm=6.000E+02[GeV] sigma=1.0733E-04 1.82E-02[pb]
Pcm=6.250E+02[GeV] sigma=1.0264E-04 1.87E-02[pb]
Pcm=6.500E+02[GeV] sigma=9.8187E-05 1.96E-02[pb]
Pcm=6.750E+02[GeV] sigma=9.4117E-05 2.03E-02[pb]
Pcm=7.000E+02[GeV] sigma=9.0290E-05 2.11E-02[pb]
Pcm=7.250E+02[GeV] sigma=8.6748E-05 2.17E-02[pb]
Pcm=7.500E+02[GeV] sigma=8.3416E-05 2.23E-02[pb]
Pcm=7.750E+02[GeV] sigma=8.0265E-05 2.30E-02[pb]
Pcm=8.000E+02[GeV] sigma=7.7399E-05 2.36E-02[pb]
Pcm=8.250E+02[GeV] sigma=7.4582E-05 2.46E-02[pb]
Pcm=8.500E+02[GeV] sigma=7.1967E-05 2.53E-02[pb]
Pcm=8.750E+02[GeV] sigma=6.9543E-05 2.57E-02[pb]
Pcm=9.000E+02[GeV] sigma=6.7232E-05 2.64E-02[pb]
Pcm=9.250E+02[GeV] sigma=6.5033E-05 2.73E-02[pb]
Pcm=9.500E+02[GeV] sigma=6.2967E-05 2.77E-02[pb]
Pcm=9.750E+02[GeV] sigma=6.1000E-05 2.85E-02[pb]
Pcm=1.000E+03[GeV] sigma=5.9176E-05 2.93E-02[pb]

Revision history for this message
Muhammad Danish Aslam (00786danish) said : 		#3

Thanks a lot.

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, 3:35 pm Alexander Belyaev, <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Your question #692869 on CalcHEP changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/calchep/+question/692869
>
> Status: Expired => Answered
>
> Alexander Belyaev changed the question status:
> Dear Muhammad,
>
> you should run this script from results folder where n_calchep binary
> for numerical calculations is located
>
> ../bin/pcm_cycle 500 25 20
>
> Then you will get what you would expect, see below.
> Please let me know if this solved the problem.
> Regards
> Alexander
>
> sasha-laptop:~/calchep/work/results> ../bin/pcm_cycle 500 25 100
> Pcm=500[GeV] sigma=1.3007E-04 1.54E-02[pb]
> Pcm=5.250E+02[GeV] sigma=1.2373E-04 1.62E-02[pb]
> Pcm=5.500E+02[GeV] sigma=1.1790E-04 1.69E-02[pb]
> Pcm=5.750E+02[GeV] sigma=1.1243E-04 1.75E-02[pb]
> Pcm=6.000E+02[GeV] sigma=1.0733E-04 1.82E-02[pb]
> Pcm=6.250E+02[GeV] sigma=1.0264E-04 1.87E-02[pb]
> Pcm=6.500E+02[GeV] sigma=9.8187E-05 1.96E-02[pb]
> Pcm=6.750E+02[GeV] sigma=9.4117E-05 2.03E-02[pb]
> Pcm=7.000E+02[GeV] sigma=9.0290E-05 2.11E-02[pb]
> Pcm=7.250E+02[GeV] sigma=8.6748E-05 2.17E-02[pb]
> Pcm=7.500E+02[GeV] sigma=8.3416E-05 2.23E-02[pb]
> Pcm=7.750E+02[GeV] sigma=8.0265E-05 2.30E-02[pb]
> Pcm=8.000E+02[GeV] sigma=7.7399E-05 2.36E-02[pb]
> Pcm=8.250E+02[GeV] sigma=7.4582E-05 2.46E-02[pb]
> Pcm=8.500E+02[GeV] sigma=7.1967E-05 2.53E-02[pb]
> Pcm=8.750E+02[GeV] sigma=6.9543E-05 2.57E-02[pb]
> Pcm=9.000E+02[GeV] sigma=6.7232E-05 2.64E-02[pb]
> Pcm=9.250E+02[GeV] sigma=6.5033E-05 2.73E-02[pb]
> Pcm=9.500E+02[GeV] sigma=6.2967E-05 2.77E-02[pb]
> Pcm=9.750E+02[GeV] sigma=6.1000E-05 2.85E-02[pb]
> Pcm=1.000E+03[GeV] sigma=5.9176E-05 2.93E-02[pb]
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>

Revision history for this message
Muhammad Danish Aslam (00786danish) said : 		#4

Thats solved my problem.