2HDM-II-BSM

Asked by Basit Ali on 2020-07-25

Hello Sir,
I am obtaining plot total width of charged higgs vs tanb ...for parameter set MH3 = 100GeV & MH=MHc = 900GeV...in THDM-II-BSM..
 BUT the result seems not correct ... The graph should be almost a straight line parallel to x-axis ...
But It comes to value of about 3GeV at tb=7 ....Which is not correct..

What solution do you suggest?

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
CalcHEP Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Alexander Belyaev (alexander.belyaev) said :
#1

How do you obtain plot for the total width?

You can send me batch and the model file to
<email address hidden>
so I can check this?

Why "the graph should be almost a straight line parallel to x-axis"
and why do you think that 3GeV at tb=7 is not correct?

Revision history for this message
Basit Ali (ali-0514) said :
#2

Sir I have calculated decay width and BR using formula for Decay H- -> W- ,H3 ...BR for this decay is 98% approx for MHc=1000GeV...
and BR is max for two decays i.e H - ->b,T and H- -> W- ,H3 ....
But for parameter set above mentioned BR comes about 10% which seems not correct ... Because MH3=100Gev...and MHc=1000GeV...
So DEcay Probability to W ,H3 should be maximum ....

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) said :
#3

This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.

Revision history for this message
Alexander Belyaev (alexander.belyaev) said :
#4

Did you solve the problem?
If not, [please send me (<email address hidden>) the model and I will take a look
the problem more closely.
Regards
Alexander

Revision history for this message
Basit Ali (ali-0514) said :
#5

Parameter Set MH3=100GeV, MH=MHc=1000GeV
Sir I have calculated decay width and BR using formula for Decay H- -> W- ,H3 ...BR for this decay is 98% approx for MHc=1000GeV...
and BR is max for two decays i.e H - ->b,T and H- -> W- ,H3 ....
But for parameter set above mentioned BR comes about 10% which seems not correct ... Because MH3=100Gev...and MHc=1000GeV...
So DEcay Probability to W ,H3 should be maximum ....

Revision history for this message
Alexander Belyaev (alexander.belyaev) said :
#6

If you want me to cross check your results,
I need the model and the parameter set.

Did you check that your results a regauge-invariant -- did you check your results in different gauges?
Regards,
Alexander

Revision history for this message
Alexander Belyaev (alexander.belyaev) said :
#7

If you want me to cross check your results,
I need the model and the parameter set.

Did you check that your results a regauge-invariant -- did you check your results in different gauges?
Regards,
Alexander

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Basit Ali for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.