On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 15:16 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> There is a branch around which does this. It was part of my fixing "bzr push" and "bzr branch" to initialize a branch object so that they could be resumed. The original change got kicked because of Robert's concern of having an empty branch show up during "bzr push".
> But the "bzr branch" code is probably still reasonable.
>
> I believe the code is at:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jameinel/bzr/fix-push2
>
> and is associated with bug 45504. (There was another fix that I also
> wrote for the bug, which I think is fix-push-alt).
>
> Someone could probably clean that up so it just contains the changes to
> .sprout() (and not to .clone()).
It's worth noting that with packs, fetch is atomic, so your branch won't
help them be resumable.
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 15:16 +0000, John A Meinel wrote: /code.launchpad .net/~jameinel/ bzr/fix- push2
> There is a branch around which does this. It was part of my fixing "bzr push" and "bzr branch" to initialize a branch object so that they could be resumed. The original change got kicked because of Robert's concern of having an empty branch show up during "bzr push".
> But the "bzr branch" code is probably still reasonable.
>
> I believe the code is at:
> https:/
>
> and is associated with bug 45504. (There was another fix that I also
> wrote for the bug, which I think is fix-push-alt).
>
> Someone could probably clean that up so it just contains the changes to
> .sprout() (and not to .clone()).
It's worth noting that with packs, fetch is atomic, so your branch won't
help them be resumable.
-Rob www.robertcolli ns.net/ keys.txt>.
--
GPG key available at: <http://