20.04 SRU

Expanding on (5): we've had problems in the past with glibc and graphical snaps on core due to the way the host's userspace drivers are mapped into the snap environment, and so are loaded with the snap's glibc. We should check that <a graphical snap> runs successfully with the core20 built from focal-proposed, on mesa-supported hardware, an NVIDIA system, (and maybe an AMD system with the proprietary stack installed? I don't know how supported we claim that is). We *might* want to test running <a graphical snap> using the focal-proposed core20 on all supported drivers and all supported releases (so, 18.04, 20.04, 21.10).

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.4) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

snapd-glib/1.58-0ubuntu0.20.04.0 (armhf)
apt/2.0.6 (armhf)
libmath-mpfr-perl/4.13-1 (armhf)
art-nextgen-simulation-tools/20160605+dfsg-4 (armhf)
ruby-nokogiri/1.10.7+dfsg1-2build1 (armhf)
r-cran-rgdal/1.4-8-1build2 (armhf)
arrayfire/3.3.2+dfsg1-4ubuntu4 (armhf)
libpango-perl/1.227-3build1 (armhf)
libimage-sane-perl/5-1 (s390x)
ruby-bootsnap/1.4.6-1 (arm64)
mle/1.4.3-1 (ppc64el, arm64)
libsyntax-keyword-try-perl/0.11-1build1 (armhf)
awesome/4.3-4 (armhf)
cysignals/1.10.2+ds-4 (arm64)
gvfs/1.44.1-1ubuntu1 (ppc64el)
libuv1/1.34.2-1ubuntu1.3 (amd64)
bali-phy/3.4.1+dfsg-2build1 (arm64, s390x)
g10k/0.5.7-1 (armhf)
litl/0.1.9-7 (amd64)
ruby-libxml/3.1.0-2 (armhf)
ffmpeg/7:4.2.4-1ubuntu0.1 (armhf)
yorick/2.2.04+dfsg1-10 (ppc64el, s390x)
linux-ibm/5.4.0-1010.11 (amd64)
liborcus/0.15.3-3build2 (armhf)
node-nodedbi/1.0.13+dfsg-1build1 (amd64)
r-bioc-delayedarray/0.12.2+dfsg-1 (armhf)
postgresql-unit/7.2-2 (armhf)
python-freecontact/1.1-5build2 (armhf)
r-cran-rwave/2.4-8-2 (armhf)
libproc-fastspawn-perl/1.2-1build2 (armhf)
linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2 (armhf)
foo2zjs/20171202dfsg0-4 (armhf)
r-cran-erm/1.0-0-1 (armhf)
libsys-cpuload-perl/0.03-8build5 (armhf)
libhttp-parser-xs-perl/0.17-1build5 (armhf)
php-luasandbox/3.0.3-2build2 (armhf)
pynfft/1.3.2-3build1 (armhf)
r-cran-processx/3.4.2-1 (ppc64el)
r-bioc-multtest/2.42.0-1 (armhf)
linux-hwe-5.13/5.13.0-23.23~20.04.2 (armhf)
python-blosc/1.7.0+ds1-2ubuntu2 (armhf)
gyoto/1.4.4-3 (armhf)
r-cran-sem/3.1.9-2build1 (armhf)
libtext-reflow-perl/1.17-1build3 (armhf)
python3.9/3.9.5-3ubuntu0~20.04.1 (armhf)
r-cran-samr/3.0-1 (armhf)
r-cran-dplyr/0.8.4-1 (armhf)
python3.8/3.8.10-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 (armhf)
findent/3.1.1-1build1 (armhf)
mercurial/5.3.1-1ubuntu1 (amd64)
libmemcached-libmemcached-perl/1.001801+dfsg-2build4 (armhf)
openbabel/3.0.0+dfsg-3ubuntu3 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#glibc

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.5) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

garli/2.1-3build1 (armhf)
fpc/3.0.4+dfsg-23 (armhf)
lazarus/2.0.6+dfsg-3 (armhf)
libuv1/1.34.2-1ubuntu1.3 (i386)
ikiwiki-hosting/0.20180719-2 (armhf)
rtags/2.37-1 (amd64)
mercurial/5.3.1-1ubuntu1 (amd64, ppc64el)
foo2zjs/20171202dfsg0-4 (armhf)
frameworkintegration/5.68.0-0ubuntu1 (armhf)
hilive/2.0a-3build2 (arm64)
ruby-libxml/3.1.0-2 (s390x)
plasma-framework/5.68.0-0ubuntu1 (armhf)
feersum/1.407-2 (s390x)
r-bioc-delayedarray/0.12.2+dfsg-1 (armhf)
php-luasandbox/3.0.3-2build2 (ppc64el)
snapd-glib/1.58-0ubuntu0.20.04.0 (armhf)
bolt/0.8-4ubuntu1 (ppc64el)
threadweaver/5.68.0-0ubuntu1 (armhf)
python3.8/3.8.10-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#glibc

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

I wrote a script for making a core20 with glibc from proposed in it:

#!/bin/sh
set -eux
snap download --basename core20_prehax core20
unsquashfs -d core20 core20_prehax.snap
a=$(dpkg --print-architecture)
v=2.31-0ubuntu9.5
build=https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/${v}/+latestbuild/${a}/+files
for p in libc6 libc-bin; do
    deb=${p}_${v}_${a}.deb
    wget $build/$deb
    dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile $deb | sudo chroot core20 tar --keep-directory-symlink -x
done
curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/snapcore/core20/master/hooks/029-fix-ld-so-symlink.chroot > core20/hook.sh
chroot core20 bash hook.sh
rm core20/hook.sh
snap pack --filename core20_posthax.snap core20
snap install --dangerous ./core20_posthax.snap

Hey Michael! I guess the new version you prepared looks good, although I'd like us to add some test case for the new glibc upgrade message viewing. Could you add it to the test-case here or create a separate bug (and attach it) for that? I'll accept it then. Thanks!

I wrote another script to install the "bad" libc version (2.31-0ubuntu9.3) on a system:

#!/bin/sh
set -eux
a=$(dpkg --print-architecture)
v=2.31-0ubuntu9.3
pkg='glibc-doc
glibc-source
libc6
libc6-lse
libc6-dbg
libc6-dev
libc-bin
libc-dev-bin
locales
locales-all
nscd'
debs=''
for p in $pkg; do
    if [ -d /usr/share/doc/$p ]; then
        if [ $p = locales ]; then
            aa=all
            b=https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/${v}/+latestbuild/amd64/+files
        else
            aa=$a
            b=https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/${v}/+latestbuild/${a}/+files
        fi
        deb=${p}_${v}_${aa}.deb
        wget $b/$deb
        debs="$debs $deb"
    fi
done
dpkg -i $debs

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.8 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.8) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ruby-stackprof/0.2.15-2 (arm64)
sphinxbase/0.8+5prealpha+1-8 (armhf)
r-cran-ps/1.3.2-2 (s390x)
linux-hwe-5.13/5.13.0-37.42~20.04.1 (armhf)
mercurial/5.3.1-1ubuntu1 (armhf, ppc64el)
linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-61.61 (armhf)
mbedtls/2.16.4-1ubuntu2 (s390x)
libreoffice/1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 (armhf)
ruby-ferret/0.11.8.7-2 (amd64)
cross-toolchain-base/43ubuntu3.1 (ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#glibc

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.9 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) for focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

hilive/2.0a-3build2 (arm64)
tomb/2.7+dfsg2-1 (arm64)
linux-hwe-5.13/5.13.0-40.45~20.04.1 (armhf)
bali-phy/3.4.1+dfsg-2build1 (s390x, arm64)
smalt/0.7.6-9 (ppc64el)
mariadb-10.3/1:10.3.34-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (armhf)
feersum/1.407-2 (s390x)
kopanocore/8.7.0-7ubuntu1 (amd64)
r-cran-ps/1.3.2-2 (s390x, ppc64el)
libreoffice/1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 (amd64)
imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu11.4 (armhf)
ruby-stackprof/0.2.15-2 (amd64)
gnome-photos/3.34.1-1 (ppc64el)
linux-azure-5.11/5.11.0-1029.32~20.04.2 (amd64)
linux-intel-5.13/5.13.0-1010.10 (amd64)
php-luasandbox/3.0.3-2build2 (armhf, arm64)
mbedtls/2.16.4-1ubuntu2 (amd64, ppc64el)
cross-toolchain-base/43ubuntu3.1 (ppc64el)
rtags/2.37-1 (amd64)
gvfs/1.44.1-1ubuntu1 (arm64, ppc64el)
linux-oem-5.14/5.14.0-1033.36 (amd64)
linux-azure-cvm/5.4.0-1076.79+cvm1 (amd64)
mercurial/5.3.1-1ubuntu1 (armhf)
r-cran-satellite/1.0.2-1build1 (armhf)
s3ql/3.3.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1 (armhf)
snapd/2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.2 (s390x, arm64, amd64, ppc64el)
sphinxbase/0.8+5prealpha+1-8 (armhf)
gemma/0.98.1+dfsg-1 (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#glibc

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

(I removed some test cases around handling upgrades from 2.31-0ubuntu9.3 as that version got superseded by a security update)

I verified part 3 of the test case, that (an appropriately configured) unattended-upgrades upgrades an arm64 with libc6-lse without complaints:

new_user@ip-172-31-25-59:~/bench$ sudo unattended-upgrade -v
Could not figure out development release: Distribution data outdated. Please check for an update for distro-info-data. See /usr/share/doc/distro-info-data/README.Debian for details.
Starting unattended upgrades script
Allowed origins are: o=Ubuntu,a=focal, o=Ubuntu,a=focal-security, o=UbuntuESMApps,a=focal-apps-security, o=UbuntuESM,a=focal-infra-security, o=Ubuntu,a=focal-updates, o=Ubuntu,a=focal-proposed, o=LP-PPA-mwhudson-devirt,a=focal
Initial blacklist:
Initial whitelist (not strict):
Packages that will be upgraded: libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dev libc6-lse
Writing dpkg log to /var/log/unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades-dpkg.log
Preconfiguring packages ...
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 169897 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../libc6-lse_2.31-0ubuntu9.9_arm64.deb ...
Unpacking libc6-lse:arm64 (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) over (2.31-0ubuntu9.7) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libc6-dev_2.31-0ubuntu9.9_arm64.deb ...
Unpacking libc6-dev:arm64 (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) over (2.31-0ubuntu9.7) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libc-dev-bin_2.31-0ubuntu9.9_arm64.deb ...
Unpacking libc-dev-bin (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) over (2.31-0ubuntu9.7) ...
Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.31-0ubuntu9.9_arm64.deb ...
Unpacking libc6:arm64 (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) over (2.31-0ubuntu9.7) ...
Setting up libc6:arm64 (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) ...
Setting up libc6-lse:arm64 (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) ...
Setting up libc-dev-bin (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) ...
Setting up libc6-dev:arm64 (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.9.1-1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) ...
All upgrades installed

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cross-toolchain-base into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cross-toolchain-base/43ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

I made a core20 snap with libc6 & libc-bin 2.31-0ubuntu9.9 in it and uploaded it to https://people.canonical.com/~mwh/core20_glibc_proposed.snap so especially brave people could test this if they wanted to.

Marking verification done. I have tested upgrades in containers and vms, I have tested upgrades on several architectures, I have tested upgrades specifically on arm64 around lib6-lse and I have tested a core20 snap with glibc from proposed on amd64, ppc64el and arm64, including a graphical snap on amd64. One thing I have not done is to test a graphical snap with core20 with the new glibc with non-integrated graphics. I don't have hardware to test this and it can hopefully be more easily done as part of the testing around promoting the new core20 to stable.

The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

This bug was fixed in the package glibc - 2.31-0ubuntu9.9

---------------
glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) focal; urgency=medium

  * Disable testsuite on riscv64. It is failing maths tests intermittently in
    ways that cannot be a glibc regression and is disabled in later series
    anyway.

glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.8) focal; urgency=medium

  * Update for 20.04. (LP: #1951033)

  [ Balint Reczey ]
  * Cherry-pick upstream patch to fix building with -moutline-atomics
  * Prevent rare deadlock in pthread_cond_signal (LP: #1899800)

  [ Matthias Klose ]
  * Revert: Use DH_COMPAT=8 for dh_strip to fix debug sections for valgrind.
    Enables debugging ld.so related issues. (LP: #1918035)
  * Don't strip ld.so on armhf. (LP: #1927192)

  [ Gunnar Hjalmarsson ]
  * d/local/usr_sbin/update-locale: improve sanity checks. (LP: #1892825)

  [ Heitor Alves de Siqueira ]
  * d/p/u/git-lp1928508-reversing-calculation-of-__x86_shared_non_temporal.patch:
    - Fix memcpy() performance regression on x86 AMD systems (LP: #1928508)

  [ Aurelien Jarno ]
  * debian/debhelper.in/libc.preinst: drop the check for kernel release
    > 255 now that glibc and preinstall script are fixed. (LP: #1962225)

  [ Michael Hudson-Doyle ]
  * libc6 on arm64 is now built with -moutline-atomics so libc6-lse can now be
    an empty package that is safe to remove. (LP: #1912652)
  * d/patches/u/aarch64-memcpy-improvements.patch: Backport memcpy
    improvements. (LP: #1951032)
  * Add test-float64x-yn to xfails on riscv64.

 -- Michael Hudson-Doyle <email address hidden> Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:24:41 +1200

This bug was fixed in the package cross-toolchain-base - 43ubuntu3.2

---------------
cross-toolchain-base (43ubuntu3.2) focal; urgency=medium

  * Skip processing the now empty libc6-lse package.
  * Build using glibc 2.31-0ubuntu9.9 (LP: #1951033)

 -- Michael Hudson-Doyle <email address hidden> Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:36:55 +1200