ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:fib_nexthops.sh: TEST: Ping with nexthop [FAIL]

Bug #1945305 reported by Stefan Bader
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntu-kernel-tests
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Seen this on 2 arm64 hosts (dazzle and starmie-kernel) for hirsute:linux(generic-64k) 5.11.0-38.42 for sru-20210927. This did pass before on dazzle, so might be a regression but only for the generic-64k flavour...

10:42:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # IPv4 runtime torture
10:42:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # --------------------
10:47:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: IPv4 torture test [ OK ]
10:47:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # ./fib_nexthops.sh: line 186: 63568 Killed ipv4_del_add_loop1
10:47:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # ./fib_nexthops.sh: line 186: 63569 Killed ipv4_grp_replace_loop
10:47:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # ./fib_nexthops.sh: line 186: 63571 Killed ip netns exec me ping -f 172.16.101.1 > /dev/null 2>&1
10:47:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # ./fib_nexthops.sh: line 186: 63573 Killed ip netns exec me ping -f 172.16.101.2 > /dev/null 2>&1
10:47:23 DEBUG| [stdout] # ./fib_nexthops.sh: line 186: 63574 Killed ip netns exec me mausezahn veth1 -B 172.16.101.2 -A 172.16.1.1 -c 0 -t tcp "dp=1-1023, flags=syn" > /dev/null 2>&1
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] #
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # IPv6
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # ----------------------
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Create nexthop with id, gw, dev [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Get nexthop by id [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Delete nexthop by id [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Create nexthop - gw only [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Create nexthop - invalid gw+dev combination [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Create nexthop - gw+dev and onlink [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthops removed on admin down [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] #
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # IPv6 groups functional
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # ----------------------
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Create nexthop group with single nexthop [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Get nexthop group by id [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Delete nexthop group by id [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthop group with multiple nexthops [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthop group updated when entry is deleted [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthop group with weighted nexthops [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Weighted nexthop group updated when entry is deleted [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthops in groups removed on admin down [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Multiple groups with same nexthop [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthops in group removed on admin down - mixed group [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthop group can not have a group as an entry [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthop group with a blackhole entry [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Nexthop group can not have a blackhole and another nexthop [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] #
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # IPv6 functional runtime
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # -----------------------
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Route add [ OK ]
10:47:24 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Route delete [ OK ]
10:47:25 DEBUG| [stdout] # TEST: Ping with nexthop [FAIL]

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

Update: the fact that the torture tests reports a lot of "killed" is at least no regression. And I just saw amd64-generic reporting this test failed on a run for ADT (though a different test and for IPv4). So this might just be coincidentally showing up with the same failure here...

Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

Found on OEM-5.14 5.14.0-1005.5
Note that this was tested on node kili due to Intel lab outage

Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

Found on Jammy linux-intel-iotg/5.15.0-1002.4 with node rizzo.

tags: added: 5.15 jammy
Revision history for this message
Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) wrote :

Found on Jammy linux-realtime 5.15.0-1025

Revision history for this message
Magali Lemes do Sacramento (magalilemes) wrote :

Found on Jammy 5.15.0-70.77+fips1 with node rizzo, 2023-03-20 cycle.

Revision history for this message
Cory Todd (corytodd) wrote :

Observed on Jammy 5.15.0-1039.45 on Oracle cloud, once in three attempts.

tags: added: sru-20230710
tags: added: sru-s20230612
removed: sru-20230710
Revision history for this message
Manuel Diewald (diewald) wrote :

Found on Jammy linux 5.15.0-97.107 with node rizzo, security cycle s2024.01.08.

Revision history for this message
Portia Stephens (portias) wrote :

Found on jammy:linux-xilinx-zynqmp 5.15.0-1027.31 development cycle d2024.02.07

Revision history for this message
Agathe Porte (gagath) wrote :

Found on focal:linux-ibm-5.15 5.15.0-1053.56~20.04.1 security cycle s2024.03.04

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.