CentOS 6 lacks remote SSH option feature

Asked by Tommy

What "remote" options do CentOS 6 users have today when the BIT rpm for CentOS 6 doesn't have the remote ssh storage features? I'm using NFS (automount) to the remote host, but is there a recommended alternative that BIT users/devs prefer? Can we expect to see the remote SSH features backported from CentOS 7 to CentOS 6 at any point?

Thanks!!

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Solved
For:
Back In Time Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Solved by:
Tommy
Solved:
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Germar (germar) said :
#1

I've no control over distribution packages and even don't know the BIT maintainer for CentOS. At the moment I only provide a repository (PPA) for Ubuntu and there is a script to create .deb packages for Debian in source tarball. But I'd like to use http://openbuildservice.org in future to provide packages for other distributions, too.

For the moment I'd install BIT from tarball on CentOS 6. Take a look at the README for all dependencies.

Revision history for this message
Tommy (tbutler-ubuntu) said :
#2

In Perl there's a way to sandbox different installations of the Perl binary, so you can get multiple versions. They call them brews. On CentOS 6 you have Python 2 installed and that's it for the system's Python. If you want Python 3, it appears you have to compile it, which is fine, but I don't know how to sandbox it. It would probably conflict with the system Python installation, which would cause problems system-wide. I'm not sure that the current tarball can be installed on CentOS 6. Am I missing something?

Revision history for this message
Ace (linuxrawkstar) said :
#3

In Perl there's a way to sandbox different installations of the Perl
binary, so you can get multiple versions. They call them brews. On CentOS
6 you have Python 2 installed and that's it for the system's Python. If
you want Python 3, it appears you have to compile it, which is fine, but I
don't know how to sandbox it. It would probably conflict with the system
Python installation, which would cause problems system-wide. I'm not sure
that the current tarball can be installed on CentOS 6. Am I missing
something?

--
Tommy Butler

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Germar <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Your question #269712 on Back In Time changed:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/backintime/+question/269712
>
> Status: Open => Answered
>
> Germar proposed the following answer:
> I've no control over distribution packages and even don't know the BIT
> maintainer for CentOS. At the moment I only provide a repository (PPA)
> for Ubuntu and there is a script to create .deb packages for Debian in
> source tarball. But I'd like to use http://openbuildservice.org in
> future to provide packages for other distributions, too.
>
> For the moment I'd install BIT from tarball on CentOS 6. Take a look at
> the README for all dependencies.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
>
> https://answers.launchpad.net/backintime/+question/269712/+confirm?answer_id=0
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/backintime/+question/269712
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>

Revision history for this message
Germar (germar) said :
#4

I switched BIT to Python3 with 1.1.0. So you could use the 1.0 series of BIT https://launchpad.net/backintime/1.0

At the moment it would be best if you branch the development tree because bug #1406087 is already fixed in there. If you have bzr you can run 'bzr branch lp:backintime/1.0'

Otherwise just use backintime-1.0.40.tar.gz and the patch I provided in bug #1406087

Revision history for this message
Tommy (tbutler-ubuntu) said :
#5

The 1.10 series does not have the sshfs and encfs features, so it's not exactly a solution. I'd love to get that encfs on CentOS 6! Thanks though :-)

Revision history for this message
Germar (germar) said :
#6

You mean 1.0.10 doesn't have SSH mode. But I added that in 1.0.12 ;-)

Latest release of the 1.0 series is 1.0.40 and this works with Python2 and provides SSH and encryption, too.

Revision history for this message
Tommy (tbutler-ubuntu) said :
#7

Thanks. This should fill the need. =)

Revision history for this message
Germar (germar) said :
#8

If necessary I can provide bugfix support for 1.0 series, too. But no new features...

Revision history for this message
Ace (linuxrawkstar) said :
#9