lp:kaliveda

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Bug #1192552: Bug KVMultiDetArray::DetectParticleIn() dans 1.9.0 rev 887	Critical	Fix Committed
Bug #1233201: Aucun noyau dans INDRA avec un IDCode4 dans les couronnes <10	Undecided	Fix Committed
Bug #1236402: error compilation KVBase.cpp: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type (32-bit machine)	Undecided	Fix Committed
Bug #1240422: erreurs avec irods multistream	Undecided	Fix Committed
Bug #1271634: algorithme d'identification dans les modules etalons	High	Fix Committed
Bug #1284567: KVINDRA does not use dataset-dependent plugins for detector classes	High	Fix Committed
Bug #1285050: wrong angles for etalon telescopes in INDRA ROOT geometry	High	Fix Committed
Bug #1346305: GetIDSubCodes() ne fonctionne plus => il n'y a plus de IDcode10	High	Fix Committed
Bug #1346319: erreur calibration rings 1-9 (ECsI ok, ESi mauvais)	High	Fix Committed
Bug #1375789: le destructeur de KVTarArchive ne fait pas ce qu'il dit	Undecided	Fix Committed
Bug #1399661: A bit of a misunderstanding between KVSeqCollection::SetCleanups() and gRoot->GetListOfCleanups()	Low	New

Link a bug report

Related blueprints

1127. By John Frankland on 2015-10-21

better safe than sorry I always say

1126. By John Frankland on 2015-10-21

xrootd library path is now sane again

1125. By John Frankland on 2015-10-21

XNet.UseOldClient: yes

otherwise xrootd hangs when trying to open files with current ROOT &
xrootd version at ccali

1124. By John Frankland on 2015-10-08

updated calibration files from Lou Augey (<email address hidden>)

1123. By Guilain Ademard on 2015-09-30

merge with IV branch

1122. By Eric Bonnet on 2015-05-04

e613 : ajout du plage supplementaire pour les gains du SI_0624

1121. By John Frankland on 2015-04-08

missed a 'fExx' in init()
version = 1.9.4

1120. By John Frankland on 2015-04-08

Backport of lp:kaliveda/1.10#1169:
Correct error in nuclear kinematics
Modification of nuclear mass due to excitation energy was badly handled.
As a result, momentum conservation was not respected for nuclear arithmetic
operations, i.e. when doing C = A + B with 3 KVNucleus objects.

1119. By Gruyer Diego on 2015-03-18

me rappel plus...

1118. By John Frankland on 2015-03-18

return order of GetX() arguments to the way they were: broken code!!
add new method GetXWithLimits() with the xmin,xmax arguments brought forwards